Re: [OPSAWG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2865 (6915)

2024-01-15 Thread Alan DeKok
On Jan 15, 2024, at 7:14 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote: > Hi RFC 2865 authors, OPSAWG, I've CC'd RADEXT, as that WG is currently active. I've also removed the 2865 authors email addresses. I believe those became inactive decades ago. > I think that this errata may be valid, but given

Re: [OPSAWG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2865 (6915)

2024-01-15 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Hi RFC 2865 authors, OPSAWG, I think that this errata may be valid, but given the age of the RADIUS protocol, and the fact that I'm not familiar with it and this is a change to the protocol, then I'm somewhat concerned with verifying this errata, and hence I propose to move it to "Held for