Rob Wilton \(rwilton\) wrote:
> Stephane or Warren can probably can correct me as a butcher the
> explanation, but ...
> ... I think that the issue is that the appendix is given as sequence of
> steps to follow, and in Step 1 (A.1), the certificate is generated
> using an
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 06:06:09PM +,
Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote
a message of 120 lines which said:
> Perhaps the explanation text needs a bit more clarity (that's
> presuming that my explanation is on the right track).
Yes, perfectly correct. Sorry, I did not provide a copy-and-paste
Stephane or Warren can probably can correct me as a butcher the explanation,
but ...
... I think that the issue is that the appendix is given as sequence of steps
to follow, and in Step 1 (A.1), the certificate is generated using an
elliptical curve algorithm, which means that by the time that
I'm confused here. What is the the correction? Seems like a fixed
version of the command using RSA instead of EC is correct, but I'm not
clear what the exact verification will be.
Joe
On 4/12/21 11:19, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Speaking to Warren offline, he suggests (as an author)
Hi,
Speaking to Warren offline, he suggests (as an author) that this errata should
be verified.
Please let me know this week if anyone feels differently, otherwise I'll verify
this at the end of the week.
Thanks,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: RFC Errata System
> Sent: 05 October
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8886,
"Secure Device Install".
--
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6299
--
Type: Technical
Reported by: Stéphane Bortzmeyer
