Hi Eric,
On 24.04.23 12:31, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
Could you be more specific?
EV> sure, the paragraph below as a "MUST" while the one before and the one
after do not. And, they are all describing 3 methods considered by this I-D. I find it
unbalanced, not critical of course.
"Using
Hello Eliot,
Thanks for the quick reply and the actions proposed in it.
Some more comments tagged with EV>
Regards
-éric
On 24/04/2023, 11:33, "Eliot Lear" mailto:l...@lear.ch>> wrote:
Thank you Eric, please see below.
On 24.04.23 10:53, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
> Éric Vyncke
Thank you Eric, please see below.
On 24.04.23 10:53, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote:
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-15: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-15: Yes
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
