Dear OPSAWG members,
after some consideration, the chairs think there is enough consensus in
the WG regarding this I-D and that it is ready to be submitted to IESG
for publication - after Shepard write-up.
For the OPSAWG co-chairs,
Henk
On 09.12.22 17:20, Henk Birkholz wrote:
Dear OPSAWG
*From: *OPSAWG on behalf of Henk Birkholz
*Date: *Friday, December 9, 2022 at 11:21 AM
*To: *opsawg
*Subject: *[OPSAWG] WG Last Call for
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-05
Dear OPSAWG members,
this email starts a four week period for a Working Group Last Call of
>
http
+1, I am supportive of this document progressing.
Owen
-Original Message-
From: Henk Birkholz
Sent: Friday 9 December 2022 16:21
To: opsawg
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-05
Dear OPSAWG members,
this email starts a four week period
, 2022 at 11:21 AM
To: opsawg
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-05
Dear OPSAWG members,
this email starts a four week period for a Working Group Last Call of
> https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ietf.org%2Farchive%2Fi
Henk Birkholz wrote:
> This internet draft updates RFC8520. The authors believe the
I think that this document needs to be Proposed Standard.
It normatively updates RFC8520, which I believe went through as AD Sponsored,
which itself is PS.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT
Dear OPSAWG members,
this email starts a four week period for a Working Group Last Call of
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-05.html
ending on Friday, January 6th 2023.
This internet draft updates RFC8520. The authors believe the
Internet-Draft is ready
