> On 16 Dec 2023, at 10:16, Adrian Farrel wrote:
>
> Personally, I don’t get the value of “inb-OAM” compared with “in-band OAM”.
> It’s not like it can be said faster (one additional syllable to say it) and
> it only saves four characters in typing.
> “oob-OAM” is also marginal. Same number o
I agree with Adrian and Stewart.
The current terms that I know of are IOAM (In situ OAM), in-band OAM (sometimes
In-band OAM or Inband OAM), and out-of-band OAM (sometimes Out-of-band OAM). I
lean to remain it as is.
Best Regards,
Xiao Min
Original
From: StewartBryant
To: adr...@olddog.co.uk
