[OPSAWG] 4026 as a downref: Document shepherd review of draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-06

2022-05-05 Thread Adrian Farrel
Just chiming in on this thread. Don't be frightened of downrefs. They are just a small piece of process easily handled. Better to set the reference correctly. If it is necessary to read RFC 4026 in order to understand part of this document, then it is a normative reference. Otherwise, of course,

Re: [OPSAWG] 4026 as a downref: Document shepherd review of draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-06

2022-05-05 Thread Wubo (lana)
Hi Tom, Adrian, all, Many thanks for your helpful comments. Rev-08 has the following changes: - Replaces the choice definition of "vpn-pm-type" to container to allow both PM type setting. - Aligns YANG security guidelines - Adds STAMP RFC 8762 as one of PM measurement protocol - Updates P, PE Y

Re: [OPSAWG] 4026 as a downref: Document shepherd review of draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-06

2022-05-05 Thread Adrian Farrel
Thanks for all the work Bo, We're just waiting on IPR responses from: ron.even@gmail.com liuc...@chinaunicom.cn xu...@chinatelecom.cn oscar.gonzalezded...@telefonica.com And I'll need the chairs to set the Intended Status of the document in the Datatracker. Cheers, Adrian -Origi