helps.
Thanks,
Bo
发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Greg Mirsky
发送时间: 2022年1月17日 7:15
收件人: adr...@olddog.co.uk
抄送: opsawg@ietf.org; ippm-cha...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
主题: Re: [OPSAWG] A review of draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service-pm-01
Hi Bo,
Thanks for the positive response.
Replies to you below. Summary: all good!
Best,
Adrian
>> Looking at Figure 1, an obvious question is why this model doesn't
augment the
>> L2/L3NM or the common VPN model. It is OK (for me) that you have chosen
to
>> augment the network topology model, b
Hi Adrian,
Many thanks for your valuable and helpful review. Please see the reply inline.
Best regards,
Bo
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk]
> 发送时间: 2022年1月17日 0:16
> 收件人: draft-ietf-opsawg-yang-vpn-service...@ietf.org
> 抄送: opsawg@ietf.org
> 主题: A review of draf
Hi Adrian, the Authors, and All,
thank you Adrian for reviewing the draft and inviting further discussion.
I've commented on this work earlier suggesting considering the performance
metrics listed in the STAMP YANG data model. I appreciate that the Authors
have found them helpful and included them
Hi authors,
This draft has been safely inside the OPSAWG for a while, so I though
it was probably due a review.
"The usual" two top-level issues:
- The draft expired earlier this month, so you need at a least a
keep-alive version.
- The draft has more than five front-page authors so the AD o
