I had to go full on gmail/html to actually see what your comments were.
Readers in the archive might be lost, and I hope my reply highlights all of
your comments.
Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
>> Perhaps change: This is contrasted with ... => This contrasts this
>> with an alternative
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls@ietf.org
, opsawg@ietf.org
, Mahesh Jethanandani
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-09
version -10 is posted, diff is at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-opsawg-mud
version -10 is posted, diff is at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-09=draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-10=--html
Rob Wilton \(rwilton\) wrote:
> I think that the document is fine and reasonably clear but could do
> with a bit of
Hi authors, WG,
Here is my AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-09.
I reviewed this doc slightly out of sequence because it was related to other
MUD files that I was reviewing and also my recent discuss on
draft-ietf-suit-mud-07<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-s
