Hi Eliot, Scott,
Thanks for this document. Here is my AD review for
draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-12.
Moderate level comments:
(1) p 3, sec 1. Introduction
To enable application-layer discovery, this memo defines a well-known
URI [RFC8615]. Management or orchestration tools can query
Hi Rob,
On 19.12.22 17:25, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
Hi Eliot, Scott,
Thanks for this document. Here is my AD review for
draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-12.
Moderate level comments:
(1) p 3, sec 1. Introduction
To enable application-layer discovery, this memo defines a well-known
Ok, this is now posted as -13.
On 06.01.23 16:28, Eliot Lear wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 19.12.22 17:25, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
Hi Eliot, Scott,
Thanks for this document. Here is my AD review for
draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-12.
Moderate level comments:
(1) p 3, sec 1. Introduction
To
6242]. The lowest RESTCONF
> >> layer
> >> is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
> >> [RFC8446].
> -Original Message-
> From: Eliot Lear
> Sent: 12 January 2023 14:24
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; draft-ietf-opsawg
Rob:
I think it's appropriate to accept all of your proposed changes with one
caveat:
On 07.02.23 14:50, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
Hi Eliot,
The only thing that I think that we need to tweak is the security section,
where I think that we need to be more explicit that this module is not de
: 27 February 2023 13:25
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ;
draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-12
Rob:
I think it's appropriate to accept all of your proposed changes with one caveat:
On 07.02.23 14:50, Rob W
ns to be included, but we can cross that
bridge during the IESG review, if needed.
Regards,
Rob
*From:*Eliot Lear
*Sent:* 27 February 2023 13:25
*To:* Rob Wilton (rwilton) ;
draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access@ietf.org
*Cc:* opsawg@ietf.org
*Subject:* Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-o
cess@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access@ietf.org>
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sbom-access-12
Rob:
I think it's appropriate to accept all of your proposed changes with one caveat:
On 07.02.23 14:5
