Hi Bo,
Thanks for addressing my comments, and your work on this document. I've now
requested IETF LC on this document.
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Wubo (lana)
> Sent: 12 March 2021 10:31
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; opsawg ;
> draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang@ietf.org
Hi Rob,
We have posted a -09 version that fixes the issues from you and Tom Petch.
Please see below:
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-09
Thanks,
Bo
-邮件原件-
发件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) [mailto:rwil...@cisco.com]
发送时间: 2021年3月11日 19:23
收件人: Wu
Thanks Bo.
Perhaps make the choice description:
"Encryption mechanism between TACACS+ client and server".
Let me know when you are done, and I'll start the IETF LC.
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Wubo (lana)
> Sent: 11 March 2021 10:46
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; opsawg
Hi Rob,
Thanks for your comments. I will submit rev-09 to resolve the issues below.
For the "shared-secret", will change the leaf to:
choice encryption {
mandatory true;
description
"A choice amongst available encryption types.";
case
Hi Bo,
Sorry, this doc slipped off my radar.
I've provided comments inline, but I think that it is only the "shared-secret"
part that needs to be resolved.
> -Original Message-
> From: Wubo (lana)
> Sent: 19 September 2020 08:47
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; opsawg ;
> draft-ietf-opsa
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the reply. Please see inline.
Best regards,
Bo
-邮件原件-
发件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) [mailto:rwil...@cisco.com]
发送时间: 2020年9月15日 18:53
收件人: Wubo (lana) ; opsawg ;
draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang@ietf.org
主题: RE: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-07
Hi Bo,
Tha
Hi Bo,
Thanks for addressing my previous comments.
Please see inline ...
> -Original Message-
> From: Wubo (lana)
> Sent: 29 August 2020 09:40
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; opsawg ;
> draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-07
-邮件原件-
发件人: tom petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com]
发送时间: 2020年9月3日 19:17
收件人: Wubo (lana) ; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
; opsawg ;
draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang@ietf.org
主题: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-07
From: Wubo (lana)
Sent: 03 September 2020 12:11
Hi Tom,
Many
From: Wubo (lana)
Sent: 03 September 2020 12:11
Hi Tom,
Many thanks for the review, will fix in the rev-09.
Or leave it and treat the comments as part of IETF Last Call (which I hope will
happen soon) - I am easy either way.
Tom Petch
Thanks,
Bo
-邮件原件-
发件人: tom petch [mailto:ie...
Hi Tom,
Many thanks for the review, will fix in the rev-09.
Thanks,
Bo
-邮件原件-
发件人: tom petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com]
发送时间: 2020年9月3日 0:13
收件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; opsawg
; draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang@ietf.org
主题: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-07
Looking
Looking at -08
Title suggest /yang/YANG/
leaf vrf-instance
might benefit from a reference to RFC8529
(ie I did not know where to look:-)
security
/cause the device vulnerable to attacks/make the device vulnerable to attacks/
IANA
Namespace /yang: ietf/yang:ietf/
Tom Petch
Hi Rob,
v-08 is posted, to address most of the your comments in the two AD reviews.
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-08
There are still some comments to confirm with you.
3. "shared-secret", should that be put under a choice statement? Is
it likely that alternat
Hi Rob,
Many thanks for your another thorough AD review, and I will consider these
comments along with previous ones.
Regards,
Bo
-邮件原件-
发件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) [mailto:rwil...@cisco.com]
发送时间: 2020年8月20日 18:38
收件人: opsawg ; draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang@ietf.org
主题: RE: AD revie
Ok, my bad. It seems that I had already done an AD review of this document :-)
Bo, there may be some additional comments that you would like to consider below
in your -08 update.
Regards,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> Sent: 20 August 2020 11:23
> To: opsawg
Hi,
This is my AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-07. Sorry that it has
been a little while in coming.
Thank you for this document, I believe that it is in good shape. I've given my
slightly more significant comments first, followed by some editorial comments.
COMMENTS:
"Section 3"
s you have suggested.
Please also see the replies in-line below for some comments to be confirmed.
Thanks,
Bo
-邮件原件-
发件人: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Rob Wilton (rwilton)
发送时间: 2020年7月11日 0:53
收件人: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang@ietf.org
抄送: opsawg
主题: [OPSAWG] AD review
Hi Joe,
Review comments also attached as txt file.
Thanks,
Rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
> Sent: 10 July 2020 23:15
> To: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
> Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang@ietf.org; opsawg
> Subject: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-07
Thanks, Rob. Maybe it’s just me, but your email is truncated as you can see
below. I also didn’t see any attachment.
Joe
> On Jul 10, 2020, at 12:52, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
>
> Apologies for the delay, but please find my AD review of the TACACS+ YANG
> module draft.
>
> I would like t
Apologies for the delay, but please find my AD review of the TACACS+ YANG
module draft.
I would like to thank the authors for their work on this document, and the WG
for providing reviews and input in this document.
I believe that the document is in good shape but propose some minor changes to
19 matches
Mail list logo
