Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-10

2023-02-06 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Hi Kenneth, Apologies for the delay in progressing this. -11 is fine. Just closing off a couple of questions inline below. From: Kenneth Vaughn Sent: 23 December 2022 15:13 To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org Subject: Re: AD review of draf

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-10

2022-12-23 Thread Kenneth Vaughn
Rob, Thank you for your detailed comments. Please see my detailed responses inline below. In general, I accepted the comments and reflected the changes in -11; the only two exceptions are that I did not add any requirements regarding the usage of hash algorithms based on prior WG discussions a

[OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-10

2022-12-19 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Hi Kevin, Sorry for the delay. Here are my AD review comments for draft-ietf-opsawg-tlstm-update-10. All my comments are pretty minor. Please let me know if you have any questions/comments, or otherwise can just post an updated version which I can then send off for IETF LC. Minor level comm