draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls
augments RFC8519 but while the RFC structures its matches as a series of
choices, the augmentation does not. Should it?
The I-D has passed WGLC but has been delayed by me making editorial comments.
AFAICT the I-D has not had a YANG Doctor review.
Tom Petch
__
tom petch wrote:
> draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls augments RFC8519 but while the RFC
> structures its matches as a series of choices, the augmentation
> does not. Should it?
What in practice does this mean for the YANG?
> The I-D has passed WGLC but has been delayed by me making
From: Michael Richardson
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2022 14:24
To: tom petch; Mahesh Jethanandani; net...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Augmenting ACLs in mud-tls
tom petch wrote:
> draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-tls augments RFC8519 but while the RFC
> structures its matc
