I did a cursory review of the Coman drafts.
These consolidate a rather useful body of knowledge, even if it is still in
flux in many areas.
It may be more important to get them published in some state, with an explicit
qualification of being somewhat work in progress, than trying to further poli
fts (like our draft-ietf-6tisch-coap) that specify the protocol.
-raghuram
From: Thomas Watteyne
mailto:watte...@eecs.berkeley.edu>>
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 at 11:15 PM
To: raghuram sudhaakar mailto:rsudh...@cisco.com>>
Subject: Fwd: [6lo] Fwd: [OPSAWG] Coman Drafts v02
Ragh
-raghuram
From: Thomas Watteyne
mailto:watte...@eecs.berkeley.edu>>
Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2014 at 11:15 PM
To: raghuram sudhaakar mailto:rsudh...@cisco.com>>
Subject: Fwd: [6lo] Fwd: [OPSAWG] Coman Drafts v02
Raghuram,
These drafts, which introduce the use cases and problem statement
below. Would that be possible?
Thomas
-- Forwarded message --
From: Thomas Watteyne
mailto:watte...@eecs.berkeley.edu>>
Date: Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 10:32 PM
Subject: Fwd: [6lo] Fwd: [OPSAWG] Coman Drafts v02
To: "6ti...@ietf.org<mailto:6ti...@ietf.org>"
<6
Dear OpsAWG WG,
The authors of draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-probstate-reqs-02 and
draft-ietf-opsawg-coman-use-cases-02 have indicated that they believe
that the document is
ready, and have asked for Working Group Last Call.
The draft is available here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsaw
Dear OPSAWG Chairs,
we submitted v02 of the Coman drafts.
As discussed in IETF #89, the authors think that the two documents are ready
for WGLC.
Please consider to start the WGLC procedure. Thank you.
Management of Networks with Constrained Devices: Problem Statement and
Requirements
http://to