Re: [OPSAWG] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-10-05 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
5:12 To: Carsten Bormann ; mohamed.boucad...@orange.com Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org; The IESG ; net...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Thanks Car

Re: [OPSAWG] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-10-05 Thread Francesca Palombini
4 octobre 2021 17:50 >> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET >> Cc : Francesca Palombini ; The IESG >> ; draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l...@ietf.org; opsawg- >> cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; net...@ietf.org >> Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-op

Re: [OPSAWG] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-10-05 Thread Carsten Bormann
2021 17:50 >> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET >> Cc : Francesca Palombini ; The IESG >> ; draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l...@ietf.org; opsawg- >> cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; net...@ietf.org >> Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg

Re: [OPSAWG] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-10-05 Thread mohamed.boucadair
wg- > cha...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; net...@ietf.org > Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg- > l3sm-l3nm-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > On 2021-10-04, at 13:34, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > > > > bytes per second (bps), >

Re: [OPSAWG] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-10-04 Thread Carsten Bormann
On 2021-10-04, at 13:34, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > > bytes per second (bps), Whoa. I know that the IETF doesn’t usually care about precision in these things, but “bps” is kitchen slang for “bit/s”, so this is very confusing. (Given that we have done the work in RFC 8428 and 8798,

Re: [OPSAWG] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-10-04 Thread Francesca Palombini
-opsawg-l3sm-l...@ietf.org , opsawg-cha...@ietf.org , opsawg@ietf.org , adr...@olddog.co.uk Subject: RE: Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) Hi Francesca, Thank you for the review. Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -Message d'orig

Re: [OPSAWG] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-10-04 Thread mohamed.boucadair
sawg@ietf.org; adr...@olddog.co.uk; adr...@olddog.co.uk > Objet : Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: > (with DISCUSS and COMMENT) > > Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: Discuss > > W

[OPSAWG] Francesca Palombini's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2021-10-04 Thread Francesca Palombini via Datatracker
Francesca Palombini has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-l3sm-l3nm-16: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer