Re: [OPSAWG] Question on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification

2017-02-14 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi Tianran, Nice summary. I think some of the confusion may be that draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification shows "Network Service YANG Modules" on the interface between OSS/BSS and the network. But the "customer service model" is at a different place in the hierarchy as shown in Figure 4

Re: [OPSAWG] Question on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification

2017-02-14 Thread Tianran Zhou
Hi, Based on the discussion, here I try to clean up the confusion of the two I-Ds. [draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification] classifies the yang modules into "Network Service YANG Module" and the "Network Element YANG Module". And usually, it uses "service module" to imply the "Network

Re: [OPSAWG] Question on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification

2017-02-08 Thread Carl Moberg (camoberg)
Team, Inline below. > On Feb 8, 2017, at 8:04 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Hi Dean, > > I've been processing your response and the continuing thread with you and > Tianran. > >>> We've been trying to ensure that draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained is >>> consistent

Re: [OPSAWG] Question on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification

2017-02-08 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi Dean, I've been processing your response and the continuing thread with you and Tianran. > > We've been trying to ensure that draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained is > > consistent with the latest version of > > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification. In discussions with Tianran a >

Re: [OPSAWG] Question on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification

2017-01-30 Thread Dean Bogdanovic
> On Jan 19, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote: > > Hi, > > We've been trying to ensure that draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explained is > consistent with the latest version of > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification. In discussions with Tianran a > question has

Re: [OPSAWG] Question on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification

2017-01-25 Thread Adrian Farrel
nuary 2017 09:33 > To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; net...@ietf.org > Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classificat...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] Question on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification > > To add more comments: > > On the L2SM meeting, several

Re: [OPSAWG] Question on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification

2017-01-23 Thread Tianran Zhou
017 12:25 AM > To: net...@ietf.org > Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; > draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classificat...@ietf.org > Subject: [OPSAWG] Question on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-model-classification > > Hi, > > We've been trying to ensure that draft-wu-opsawg-service-model-explaine