Hi there,
[Copying GROW WG as this might be relevant to their coverage areas]
The document seems to be a good start but covers only standard
communities. This is not sufficient given the universal deployment of 4
octet ASNs. Both extended communities [RFC4360] and large communities
[RFC8092]
I have read the draft, it is well written and it looks correct, and indeed
there does not seem to be much more to do other than ask the IPFIX IE
Doctors to take a look at it.
Given that there are operator requests for this information to be exported
by an IPFIX exporter we should adopt the draf
[mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Tianran Zhou
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:37 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for
draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
Dear OPSAWG,
In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this
: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
Dear OPSAWG,
In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE
extension draft.
By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs
Hi,ALL
I think the extension of IPFIX is valuable in carrying the BGP community
information. I support for the adoption.
Regards.
Fangwei
＞[OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
＞Tianran Zhou ＜zhoutian...@huawei.com＞ Mon, 13 February 2017 03:35
Dear all. I think the extension of IPFIX is valuable in carrying the BGP
community information. Personally I agree on the adoption as a work group
document.
Regards.
Fangwei
Dear IPFIX,
Since the IPFIX WG is concluded, this IE extension draft is processed now in
OPSAWG.Thanks very mu
Dear OPSAWG,
In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE
extension draft.
By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like
to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be
adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.
E
