Hi WG,
This mail starts a two weeks working group adoption call for
draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl-03
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl/
Please send over your objections or supports to the mailing list.
If you object the adoption, please also give the reason, so that the authors
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this draft.
Best Regards,
Wei
-- Original --
From:
"Tianran Zhou"
As a contributor, I support adoption of this work. I have previously read and
commented on this document. The main reason for my comment this time is to
address something that was brought up at the mic in 117. There was a question
asked about needing deep packet inspection to effectively impl
king group adoption call for draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl-03
Hi WG,
This mail starts a two weeks working group adoption call for
draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl-03
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl/
Please send over your objections or supports to the mailing list.
If you object the adop
, Dan.
From: OPSAWG On Behalf Of duzongp...@foxmail.com
Sent: Friday, September 8, 2023 8:59 AM
To: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Working group adoption call for
draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl-03
Hi, all
I support the adoption. It is useful fo
Hi Charis, and All,
I support the adoption of this draft. The work is quite helpful on network
operation and management.
Thanks and Regards,
Cheng Zhou
From: Tianran Zhou
Date: 2023-09-05 09:12
To: opsawg@ietf.org
CC: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] Working group adoption call for
need to make
provision for that, possibly by approaching SAAG to get a security
reviewer assigned.
From: OPSAWG On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 2:13 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] Working group adoption call for draft-ma-ops
t a security
reviewer assigned.
From: OPSAWG mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org>> On
Behalf Of Tianran Zhou
Sent: Tuesday, September 5, 2023 2:13 AM
To: opsawg@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg-cha...@ietf.org>
Subject: [OPSAWG] Working group ado
Hi,
I think this is an interesting topic and the addressed use case seems to be
promising.
The question, whether a DPI is needed to effectively implement this is also
interesting.
In case it could be avoided it will in my opinion an implementation advantage.
I saw a lot of positive feedback reg
)
Sent: Thursday, September 7, 2023 7:01 PM
To: Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Working group adoption call for draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl-03
As a contributor, I support adoption of this work. I have previously read and
commented on this document. The
...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Working group adoption call for draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl-03
Hi Tianran,
I think this is a timely piece of work that should be adopted. I commit
to further reviews if it is adopted.
A few minor comments on this version, below. Nothing that needs to be
fixed before
Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Working group adoption call for draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl-03
Hi all,
Apologies for being late on expressing my view.
I support the adoption of the draft.
After reading it, some question coming to my mind is if the users / devices
could be defined
group adoption call for draft-ma-opsawg-ucl-acl-03
As a contributor, I support adoption of this work. I have previously read and
commented on this document. The main reason for my comment this time is to
address something that was brought up at the mic in 117. There was a question
asked about
13 matches
Mail list logo
