Re: [OPSAWG] bof proposal review

2016-10-05 Thread Marc Blanchet
On 5 Oct 2016, at 15:16, Brian E Carpenter wrote: Description: With the dynamic nature of SDN/NFV networks, providers and data center operators have to manage more dynamically the IP addressing and provisioning of network nodes, Undoubtedly true. I would like to mention that this is clearly

Re: [OPSAWG] bof proposal review

2016-10-05 Thread Brian E Carpenter
> Description: With the dynamic nature of SDN/NFV networks, providers and > data center operators have to manage more dynamically the IP addressing > and provisioning of network nodes, Undoubtedly true. I would like to mention that this is clearly a target area for autonomic networking too; in f

Re: [OPSAWG] bof proposal review

2016-10-05 Thread Marc Blanchet
On 5 Oct 2016, at 12:45, joel jaeggli wrote: On 10/4/16 8:02 AM, Marc Blanchet wrote: Hello, the bof proposal below have been sent to OPS ADs (and INT ADs) and posted on the BOF wiki page. Benoît asked that this to be discussed here, since there is no public mailing list yet for this topic

Re: [OPSAWG] bof proposal review

2016-10-05 Thread joel jaeggli
On 10/4/16 8:02 AM, Marc Blanchet wrote: > Hello, > the bof proposal below have been sent to OPS ADs (and INT ADs) and > posted on the BOF wiki page. Benoît asked that this to be discussed > here, since there is no public mailing list yet for this topic (we > shall soon). So, I think we dicussed

[OPSAWG] bof proposal review

2016-10-04 Thread Marc Blanchet
Hello, the bof proposal below have been sent to OPS ADs (and INT ADs) and posted on the BOF wiki page. Benoît asked that this to be discussed here, since there is no public mailing list yet for this topic (we shall soon). The primary purpose of the BOF is to extend the discussion to more