Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh updates RFC 7012? 5610? was (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-09.txt)

Hi Benoît, Good point, but I don't think we need an update here. I suggest this change to draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh: OLD: The type "unsigned256" represents a non-negative integer value in the range of '0' to '2^256 - 1'. NEW: The type "unsigned256" represents a non-negative integer

[OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh updates RFC 7012? 5610? was (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-09.txt)

Dear all, With the introduction of new unsigned256  IPFIX data type (section 8.2), I am wondering whether draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh updates RFC 7012? I guess so From RFC7012: 3.1 . Abstract Data Types This section

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-08 shepherd review

Dear Med, That was a mistake by me. The idnits showed nothing. All clear. Will update the shepherd review in the next iteration. Bets wishes Thomas -Original Message- From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 11:02 AM To: Graf Thomas, INI-NET-VNC-HCS ;

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-08 shepherd review

Hi Thomas, Thank you much for preparing the writeup. I'm not sure I received the comments mentioned in point 14 of the writeup, though. I suspect this is because of the issues I'm having with the IETF aliases. Please forward me offline these comments. Thanks and apologies for the

[OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-08 shepherd review

Dear Med and Benoit, Thanks a lot. The document is very well written and straight forward. As shared previously during the working group, I believe this document is very valuable to network operators since it addresses current issues in the observation of IPv6 headers and TCP options. I have

[OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh

Hi 6man, FWIW, the following specification is being developed in OPSWAG: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh/ Comments to the extension headers part of the spec are welcome. Cheers, Med