subject:"\[OPSAWG\] draft\-ietf\-opsawg\-ipfix\-tcpo\-v6eh updates RFC 7012\? 5610\? was \(Re\: I\-D Action\: draft\-ietf\-opsawg\-ipfix\-tcpo\-v6eh\-09.txt\)"

Re: [OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh updates RFC 7012? 5610? was (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-09.txt)

2024-02-05 Thread mohamed . boucadair

dates RFC 7012? 5610? was (Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-09.txt) Dear all, With the introduction of new unsigned256 IPFIX data type (section 8.2), I am wondering whether draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh updates RFC 7012? I guess so >From RFC7012: 3.1<https://dat

[OPSAWG] draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh updates RFC 7012? 5610? was (Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-09.txt)

2024-02-05 Thread Benoit Claise

Dear all, With the introduction of new unsigned256 IPFIX data type (section 8.2), I am wondering whether draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh updates RFC 7012? I guess so From RFC7012: 3.1 . Abstract Data Types This section