Hi Paul,
-10 fixes all these, including the ToC level.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Med
De : Aitken, Paul
Envoyé : mardi 21 mai 2024 22:58
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ;
drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org
Cc : ie-doct...@ietf.org; opsawg
Objet : Re: [Ie-doctors] [IANA #1363822] Expert review
Med,
* In the TOC, all the OLD / NEW section names are distracting. It would be much
more readable if the TOC was limited to just two levels:
1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Conventions and Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
fix-fixes.txt>
Please see inline for more context.
Cheers,
Med
De : Aitken, Paul
Envoyé : mercredi 8 mai 2024 11:42
À : drafts-expert-review-comm...@iana.org; BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
Cc : ie-doct...@ietf.org; opsawg
Objet : Re: [Ie-doctors] [IANA #1363822] Expert review for
draft-ietf-
This document is simply too long to review. I'm about half way through, and
will not have time to complete the review before May 10th.
* In the TOC, all the OLD / NEW section names are distracting. It would be much
more readable if the TOC was limited to just two levels:
1. Introduction
