[OPSAWG]Re: [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-08

Hi Joe, Great. Thank you. Cheers, Med De : to...@strayalpha.com Envoyé : vendredi 17 mai 2024 23:14 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET Objet : Re: [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-08 AOK - all set. Joe — Dr. Joe Touch, temporal epistemologist www.stray

[OPSAWG]Re: [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-08

Med, Joe, - Reduced-size encoding per RFC7011 does not apply, unless you are restricting them to 64, 32, 16, and 8. [Med] There is no such restriction because of this part in the base spec: This behavior is indicated by the Exporter by specifying a size in the Template wi

[OPSAWG]Re: [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-08

Hi Joe, Thank you for the follow-up. A candidate version can be seen at: Diff: draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix.txt - draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix.txt

[OPSAWG]Re: [Last-Call] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-08

Hi, Med, I still have issue with the same two key parts: 1. This doc refers to unsigned192. - That is not a native data type of any known computer. It needs to be defined. - Reduced-size encoding per RFC7011 does not apply, unless you are restricting them to 64, 32, 16, and 8.