Re: [OPSAWG] A review of draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-16

2022-02-21 Thread Haoyu Song
Hi Adrian, Thank you very much for the review and editing! We'll update the draft to reflect the latest thoughts. I agree with you that the IPv4 extension is unlikely to happen so we'll remove that part in the new revision. Best regards, Haoyu -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel

Re: [OPSAWG] A review of draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-16

2022-02-21 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Hi Adrian, authors, WG, Warren, Martin Duke, and I looked at this document almost 2 years back, noted that the work that it is describing seemed to be close to work chartered in IPPM WG, and hence recommended to the authors, via Tianran, that this work should be presented to IPPM to see if ther

Re: [OPSAWG] A review of draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-16

2022-02-22 Thread Haoyu Song
much! Best regards, Haoyu -Original Message- From: Rob Wilton (rwilton) Sent: Monday, February 21, 2022 11:07 AM To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framew...@ietf.org Cc: opsawg@ietf.org Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] A review of draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-16 Hi Adrian, autho

Re: [OPSAWG] A review of draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-16

2022-02-23 Thread Rob Wilton (rwilton)
gards, Rob -Original Message- From: Haoyu Song Sent: 23 February 2022 01:27 To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; adr...@olddog.co.uk; draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framew...@ietf.org Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; opsawg-cha...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] A review of draft-song-opsawg-ifit-framework-16 Hi Rob, Tha