On 1/16/2024 11:10 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
Are you expecting the implementation to have an exhaustive list of all
of the ExIDs in use to understand the difference between 2 and 4 byte
usage?
*/[Med] Yes because otherwise an implem can’t unambiguously identify
and extract
Hi Joe,
Thanks for the follow-up.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : to...@strayalpha.com
Envoyé : lundi 15 janvier 2024 17:17
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET
Cc : int-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix@ietf.org;
opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : Re: Intdir early review of
Hi Tommy,
Thanks for clarifying. You have a valid point.
Updated the type to point to unsigned256, which is now defined in
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Tommy Pauly
> Envoyé : lundi 15 janvier 2024 15:06
> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-tsvwg-udp-ipfix-06.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG
of the IETF.
Title: Export of UDP Options Information in IP Flow Information Export
(IPFIX)
Authors: Mohamed Boucadair
The changes look good to me; I just want to make sure you understand one
of my questions that doesn't look like it was clear enough:
On 1/15/2024 4:13 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
- The way an implementation understands the TCP ExIDs may benefit
from slightly more explanation:
--
Hi Wes,
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
De : Wesley Eddy
Envoyé : mardi 16 janvier 2024 16:09
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; tsv-...@ietf.org
Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : Re: Tsvart early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh-05
The
Dear Greg,
Thank you for your interest in our draft, and the associated extensive
comments! All welcome!
*CMP: Please find some additional follow-ups.*
On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 7:52 PM Greg Mirsky wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
> thank you for your kind consideration of my notes. Please find my
>
I’d actually like to suggest this doc avoid repeating information in other
docs, notably the UDP options spec.
In particular:
- there is no need to replicate Fig 1
- there is no need to replicate the definitions of SAFE or UNSAFE
All these things can be “as defined in X”. That avoids any issues