Maybe at the end of this year we should look into the milestones again and see 
what is missed or changed?


G/

From: opsec-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsec-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of KK
Sent: 02 July 2013 03:57
To: joel jaeggli
Cc: opsec@ietf.org; opsec chairs
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] Revised Charter Text

Yes indeed, I think an update of the milestones is a bit overdue. We did one 
late last year, will work on getting updates in.

On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 2:41 PM, joel jaeggli 
<joe...@bogus.com<mailto:joe...@bogus.com>> wrote:
On 6/30/13 10:11 AM, KK wrote:
Hey Folks,

Just a reminder, we'll be wrapping this up today.
this is a perhaps related question that is  NOT tied to the charter text which 
is are there milestone(s) which we should be  adding associated with particular 
areas of work that are ongoing (the nd security draft).

joel
Thanks,
KK



On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:59 AM, KK <k...@google.com<mailto:k...@google.com> 
<mailto:k...@google.com<mailto:k...@google.com>>> wrote:

    Dear All,

    The chairs in conjunction with our AD, Joel, recently worked on a
    draft revision to our charter text. The changes in this revision
    are mostly related to elaborating on the type of documents this WG
    produces along with some minor wordsmithing here and there.

    We would like to get you to review the text and provide comments.
    Please have a read and voice an opinion one way or the other. If
    we don't hear any objections by June 30th, we'll assume you love
    it and proceed.

    Thanks,
    KK, Gunter, Warren

    P.S. The current version of the charter can be found at
    http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsec/charter/


    **********

    Proposed Revised OPSEC Charter:

    """

    Goals:


    The OPSEC WG will document operational issues and best current
    practices with regard to network security. In particular, efforts
    will be made to clarify the rationale supporting current
    operational practice, address gaps in currently understood best
    practices for forwarding, control plane, and management plane
    security and clarify liabilities inherent in security practices
    where they exist.


    Scope:


    The scope of the OPSEC WG is intended to include the protection
    and secure operation of the forwarding, control and management
    planes. Documentation of operational issues, revision of existing
    operational

    security practices documents and proposals for new approaches to
    operational challenges related to network security are in scope.


    Method:


    It is expected that the product of the working group will result
    in the publication of informational or BCP RFCs. Taxonomy or
    problem statement documents may provide a basis for such documents.


    Informational or Best Current Practices Document


    For each topic addressed, a document that attempts to capture
    common practices related to secure network operation will be
    produced. This will be primarily based on operational experience.
    A document might convey:


    * a threat or threats to be addressed

    * current practices for addressing the threat

    * protocols, tools and technologies extant at the time of writing
    that are used to address the threat

    * the possibility that a solution does not exist within existing
    tools or technologies


    Taxonomy and Problem Statement Documents


    A document which attempts to describe the scope of particular
    operational security challenge or problem space without
    necessarily coming to a conclusion or proposing a solution. Such a
    document might

    be a precursor to an informational or best current practices document.


    While the principal input of the working group is operational
    experience and needs, the output should be directed towards
    providing guidance to the operators community, other working
    groups that develop

    protocols or the community of protocol developers at large and
    implementers of these protocols.


    Non-Goals:


    The OPSEC WG is not the place to do new protocols. New protocol
    work should be addressed in a working group chartered in the
    appropriate area or as individual submissions. The OPSEC WG may
    take on documents related to the practices of using such work.


    """



_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to