Dear OpSec WG,

Be not alarmed.
This email was created to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with 
Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"  (http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6702.txt).


We would like to check whether any claims of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) 
on the document have not yet been disclosed.
(I know none were submitted for the -03 version, however the draft progressed 
since request to -06)

Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to 
draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-06?  If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance 
with IETF IPR rules?
(See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.)

If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document, please 
reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are personally aware of 
any relevant IPR.  We might not be able to advance this document to the next 
stage until we have received a reply from each author and listed contributor. 
Please add opsec WG email list as recipient.

If you are on the OpSec WG email list but are not an author or listed 
contributor for this document, you are reminded of your opportunity for a 
voluntary IPR disclosure under BCP 79.  Please do not reply unless you want to 
make such a voluntary disclosure.

Online tools for filing IPR disclosures can be found at 
<http://www.ietf.org/ipr/file-disclosure>.

Thanks,
Gunter Van de Velde
(as OpSec WG co-chair)


_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to