Re: [OPSEC] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi, Roman, Thanks a lot for your comments! In-line... On 13/7/21 10:23, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote: [] > -- > DISCUSS: > -- > > Can the principled

[OPSEC] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-08: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

[OPSEC] Intdir last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-08

Reviewer: Tim Chown Review result: Ready with Nits Hi, This draft provides an analysis of IPv6 Extension Headers and Options, discusses the implications of discarding packets containing them, and makes recommendations on configurable filtering policy for each EH and Option for transit routers. I

Re: [OPSEC] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-08: (with COMMENT)

Replying with my IPv6 + shepherd hats Indeed, I fail to understand why *transit* SP are dropping EH (as opposed to final destination router/firewall, which should drop some EH) I sincerely hope that this document will rather 'open the gate' as some EH are recommended to go through -éric 

[OPSEC] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-08: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please r