Re: [OPSEC] [IPv6] [v6ops] Why folks are blocking IPv6 extension headers? (Episode 1000 and counting) (Linux DoS)

2023-05-22 Thread David Farmer
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:53 AM Michael Richardson wrote: > > David Farmer wrote: > > "permissionless innovation." That being said, we MUST balance these > > multiple priorities. which means we can not completely sacrifice > > "permissionless

Re: [OPSEC] [IPv6] [v6ops] Why folks are blocking IPv6 extension headers? (Episode 1000 and counting) (Linux DoS)

2023-05-22 Thread David Farmer
t techniques for hosts wanting the communicate using EHs that are not allowed on the network path between them. Maybe call this EH traversal, and it likely involves a tunnel or encapsulating the packet with the unknown EHs between the two hosts. I'll note that adding EHs in flight is not allo

Re: [OPSEC] [IPv6] Why folks are blocking IPv6 extension headers? (Episode 1000 and counting) (Linux DoS)

2023-05-17 Thread David Farmer
roach the two of you seem to be offering for IPv6 extension headers, is there something in between? If not, then maybe that is what we need to be working towards. Thanks -- === David Farmer Email:far...@umn.edu Networking & Telecommuni

Re: [OPSEC] [Tsv-art] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-eh-filtering-06

2018-12-04 Thread David Farmer
y on were designed that way, which they are not. It would easily take a decade or more for all the old legacy routers to fade away on the Internet. Those are facts we have to work with. -- === David Farmer Email:far...@umn.edu Networking &