Hi Eric
Just checking if you had a chance look my Shepherd review.
Kind Regards
Gyan
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 7:38 PM Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
>
> Hi Eric
>
> Shepherd Review below:
>
> Abstract
>
> “ This document is only applicable to managed
>
>netw
h as well as 6to6 tunnels.
Kind Regards
Gyan
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 3:30 AM Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
wrote:
> Thank you Gyan
>
>
>
> -éric
>
>
>
> *From: *Gyan Mishra
> *Date: *Monday, 26 April 2021 at 06:34
> *To: *opsec WG , OpSec Chairs ,
> Eric Vyncke
Hi Eric
I will do another final Shepherd review now of the draft as this draft as
it is on its way to publication.
Kind Regards
<http://www.verizon.com/>
*Gyan Mishra*
*Network Solutions A**rchitect *
*Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com *
*M 301 50
Agreed. We will update the draft to reflect.
This is exactly what I have been looking for in an enterprise setting and I
see it’s authored by ISC.
Thank you for enlightening me.
Gyan
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 4:53 AM Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2019, at 8:12 PM, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
>> On Nov 19, 2019, at 2:30 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 18, 2019, at 1:50 AM, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>> ULA mentioned in section 2.1 mentions use case described in RFC 4864 but
>> should mention section 3.2 of that document. I think we could add some
&g
Ted
Thank you for the comments.
In the abstract it does mention the audience but needs to be clearer as I agree
to your point that this document is geared for a managed network and not for
unmanaged or home network.
ULA mentioned in section 2.1 mentions use case described in RFC 4864 but shou
> On Nov 9, 2019, at 9:15 PM, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>> On Nov 9, 2019, at 4:49 PM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 9 Nov 2019, at 22:35, Bob Hinden wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> The hop-by-hop option
> On Nov 9, 2019, at 4:49 PM, Ole Troan wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 9 Nov 2019, at 22:35, Bob Hinden wrote:
>>
>> The hop-by-hop options header, when present in an IPv6 packet, forces
>> all nodes in the path to inspect this header in the original IPv6
>> specification [RFC2460]. This
> On Nov 9, 2019, at 3:54 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
>
> Gyan,
>
>> On Nov 9, 2019, at 12:09 PM, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 9, 2019, at 11:46 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
>>>
>>> Eric,
>>>
>>
The term “punt to cpu” is commonly used by router vendors when switching from
the slow software switched path which hits the RP CPU versus the hardware
switched fast path which remains on the line card NP processor.
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> -éric
>>
>>
ences like they are as we believe that they make the
> document more valuable for the reader.
>
> Regards
>
> -éric
>
> From: Gyan Mishra
> Date: Saturday, 9 November 2019 at 08:28
> To: Eric Vyncke
> Cc: "opsec@ietf.org" , "i-d-annou...@ietf.org
e wrong for Merike BTW but she is quadri-lingual
>
> On 04/11/2019, 15:26, "Gyan Mishra" wrote:
>
> Hi Eric
>
> Just checking what the updates are that went in v21 since this
> document is now ready to be published just pending my Shepard writeup which
> I p
Hi Eric
Just checking what the updates are that went in v21 since this document is now
ready to be published just pending my Shepard writeup which I plan to finish
this week.
Thank you
Gyan
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 3, 2019, at 4:56 PM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
>
>
> A New In
Thank you
Gyan
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 26, 2019, at 1:58 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>
> No IPR on my side.
>
> -éric
>
> From: Kiran Kumar Chittimaneni
> Date: Saturday, 26 October 2019 at 00:11
> To: Gyan Mishra
> Cc: Eric Vyncke , R
etf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/edit/shepherdwriteup/
> (you need to create a free account on datatracker if not yet done), the
> mailing list archive should also be a source of information
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/?q=draft-ietf-opsec-v6
>
>
> On 15/10/2019
notice in
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCfC0QrYg$
> this latest revision addresses a suggestion by Gyan Mishra issued during
> the Working Group Last
> On Oct 10, 2019, at 12:46 PM, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
> Hi Eric
>
> Thank you
>
> Responses in-line
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Oct 7, 2019, at 3:00 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) wrote:
>>
>> Gyan,
>>
>> Thank you for reviewi
point of view on the
> stability of IPv6 addresses in the specific case of a “trusted network”, esp
> when RFC 7127 and 8064 are widely deployed.
>
> See more comments in line with EV>
>
> Regards
>
> -éric
>
> From: Gyan Mishra
> Date: Tuesday, 24
Communications Inc. (VZ)
13101 Columbia Pike FDC1 3rd Floor
Silver Spring, MD 20904
United States
Phone: 301 502-1347
Email: gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com
www.linkedin.com/in/GYAN-MISHRA-RS-SP-MPLS-IPV6-EXPERT
___
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
19 matches
Mail list logo
