Hi, Eduard,
On 25/5/23 07:21, Vasilenko Eduard wrote:
IMHO: Fernando comes here with a good example (EH DoS). Security is a good
reason to block EHs.
But for business, every feature should be tested, supported, and somebody
should pay an additional performance penalty.
I am not sure which
;>
> Cc: Manfredi (US), Albert E <mailto:albert.e.manfr...@boeing.com>>; IPv6 Operations <mailto:v6...@ietf.org>>; 6man mailto:i...@ietf.org>>;
> opsec@ietf.org <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [OPSEC] [EXTERNAL] Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Why folks are
rd
Cc: Fernando Gont ; Manfredi (US), Albert E
; IPv6 Operations ; 6man
; opsec@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] [EXTERNAL] Re: [IPv6] [v6ops] Why folks are blocking IPv6
extension headers? (Episode 1000 and counting) (Linux DoS)
+1 just that the ‘additional cost’ and the ’security risk’ are not sym
3 8:12 AM
> To: Fernando Gont mailto:fg...@si6networks.com>>
> Cc: Manfredi (US), Albert E <mailto:albert.e.manfr...@boeing.com>>; IPv6 Operations <mailto:v6...@ietf.org>>; 6man mailto:i...@ietf.org>>;
> opsec@ietf.org <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
> Subj
] [v6ops] Why folks are blocking IPv6
extension headers? (Episode 1000 and counting) (Linux DoS)
Would like to support Fernando again, and not just because I have a Sony TV
too.
Cybersecurity is in such a bad state that I can only plea for a sense of
realism and pragmatism vs dogmatism to get
Would like to support Fernando again, and not just because I have a Sony TV
too.
Cybersecurity is in such a bad state that I can only plea for a sense of
realism and pragmatism vs dogmatism to get real solutions at hand to the
defenders practitioners
If not I will ask people here to consider
-Original Message-
From: ipv6 On Behalf Of Fernando Gont
> Given the amount of things that get connected to the Net (smart bulbs,
> refrigerators, etc.) -- and that will super-likely never receive security
> updates, you may have to **rely on your own network**.
>
> For instance, I
