-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Marcel wrote:
> * Tim McCormack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> David Vennik wrote:
>>> slightly ot: is my postings getting on the list and if so why is it i'm
>>> not getting them back (perhaps my spam filter?)
>> I receive yours. I don't receive m
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 12:28:14PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.9K bytes in
15 lines about:
: Vidalia apparently tried to launch dwwin.exe, which is apparently the name
: of Microsoft's Doctor Watson error reporting tool. Does Vidalia utilize
: Doctor Watson to report errors that occur duri
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 09:56:56PM -0400, marlowe wrote:
> I have discovered the following error message in my log files:
>
> "[notice] cull_wedged_cpuworkers(): Bug: closing wedged cpuworker. Can
> somebody find the bug?"
>
> Has anyone else seen this and if so what information can I provide to
All,
I have discovered the following error message in my log files:
"[notice] cull_wedged_cpuworkers(): Bug: closing wedged cpuworker. Can
somebody find the bug?"
Has anyone else seen this and if so what information can I provide to
help track down this bug?
Thanks,
Patrick
* Tim McCormack ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> David Vennik wrote:
> > slightly ot: is my postings getting on the list and if so why is it i'm
> > not getting them back (perhaps my spam filter?)
>
> I receive yours. I don't receive my own.
>
> - Tim McCormack
>
i receive mine
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 12:48:48PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote:
[...]
> Oct 23 12:09:06.074 [warn] eventdns: Nameserver 10.0.0.4 is back up
>
> This always seems to happen if there are more than a few (<5)
> DNS requests per second. Am I the only one seeing this?
No, this seems to be a (relatively
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 06:48:34AM -0700, Total Privacy wrote:
[...]
> Howdoyoudo my friend, hear you was in some company with access to a
> storage of very secret certificates, huh?
>
> His buddy answer:
> Yeah! That?s top secret, peoples bank business would crash if that
> gets out, but sadly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Vennik wrote:
> slightly ot: is my postings getting on the list and if so why is it i'm
> not getting them back (perhaps my spam filter?)
I receive yours. I don't receive my own.
- Tim McCormack
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Tim McCormack wrote:
>
> Total Privacy wrote:
>> Somebody contact his old fellow (out on a walk whit no bug mics around)
>> saying:
>> Howdoyoudo my friend, hear you was in some company with access to a storage
>> of very secret certificates,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Total Privacy wrote:
> Somebody contact his old fellow (out on a walk whit no bug mics around)
> saying:
> Howdoyoudo my friend, hear you was in some company with access to a storage
> of very secret certificates, huh?
More likely is that root ce
Total Privacy wrote:
> Later on, all between friends, more and more copys get out and finally
> somebody on the embassy of some very anti-freedom country get one, hand it
> over to their computer police, saying: Splendid, now we can execute internet
> users in millions every day!
>
> Now, wha
In the configuration file, there is an EntryNodes and ExitNodes entry, but no MiddleNodes. Is it possible for me to include a list of preferred middle nodes?Thanks, Eric
R. Snyder wrote:
> Vidalia apparently tried to launch dwwin.exe, which is apparently the
> name of Microsoft's Doctor Watson error reporting tool. Does Vidalia
> utilize Doctor Watson to report errors that occur during its operation?
My guess is that Doctor Watson inserts itself into running prog
Maybe a different approach, but how about this scenario. Real life practise,
far beyond regulations and bureaukracy...
Somebody contact his old fellow (out on a walk whit no bug mics around) saying:
Howdoyoudo my friend, hear you was in some company with access to a storage of
very secret cert
Vidalia apparently tried to launch dwwin.exe, which is apparently the name
of Microsoft's Doctor Watson error reporting tool. Does Vidalia utilize
Doctor Watson to report errors that occur during its operation? If so, how
much information about the computer on which the error occurs is
transm
George Shaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-10-20 at 09:53, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > George Shaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2006-10-18 at 12:47, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > > > . . . They aren't attacking Tor, but misconfigured applications
> > > > behind the Tor client.
> >
Hi,
I have the same problem each time I start my home server (Windows XP
SP2), I get those lines a few times (however, it shows my local IP, not
my remote IP) but despite that everything seems to be normal. Usually
the last line ends like yours: .. is back up. So I believe since it ends
with "is b
With Tor 0.1.2.2-alpha running as exit node on
FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT I constantly get warnings
like:
Oct 23 11:56:02.760 [warn] eventdns: Nameserver 10.0.0.4 is back up
Oct 23 11:56:21.183 [warn] eventdns: Nameserver 81.169.148.164 has failed: Bad
response 2 (server failed)
Oct 23 11:56:23.770 [war
18 matches
Mail list logo
