Safari proxy switch applescript

2006-10-25 Thread Christopher Soghoian
Hi Guys, In response to a request from Paul Syverson, I fixed up an applescript I found online to work with the latest version of Mac OSX. Safari does not have its own proxy settings, and instead, uses whatever the OS is using. This script toggles the settings between either no proxy, or the loc

Re: Silly question

2006-10-25 Thread Fergie
Thanks everyone for the response -- alles klar. :-) - ferg -- "John Kimble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oct 24 23:15:19:698 [Notice] Tor v0.1.2.2-alpha. This is experimental > software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity. > Oct 24 23:15:19:886 [Notice] Opening Control listener on 127.0.0.1

Re: Silly question

2006-10-25 Thread John Kimble
Oct 24 23:15:19:698 [Notice] Tor v0.1.2.2-alpha. This is experimental software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity. Oct 24 23:15:19:886 [Notice] Opening Control listener on 127.0.0.1:9051 Oct 24 23:15:20:167 [Notice] We now have enough directory information to build circuits. Oct 24 23:15:25:2

Re: Silly question...

2006-10-25 Thread Fergie
Yep, it eventually came up and built a circuit just fine. Was just curious... Thanks! - ferg -- David Vennik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 you expressed exactly what my first thought was in response - that the client was merely persistently att

Re: Silly question...

2006-10-25 Thread coderman
On 10/25/06, Arrakistor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... That is definitely a hiccup in the Tor directory server you mean servers? there are more than one and the likelihood of them all failing / partitioning at once is really low.

Re: Silly question...

2006-10-25 Thread Arrakistor
Fergie, That is definitely a hiccup in the Tor directory server. Port 80 is for surfing web traffic, so ALL tor servers should allow that. I'm betting it is a random thing. ST

Re: "Practical onion hacking: finding the real address of Tor clients"

2006-10-25 Thread GeorgeDS
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 14:45, coderman wrote: > On 10/24/06, George Shaffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ... > > It's not that I don't trust my firewall, I just don't want to invite > > random attacks, because a broad probe of many port 80s, happens to find > > an open one on my machine. > > as y

Re: Silly question...

2006-10-25 Thread David Vennik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 you expressed exactly what my first thought was in response - that the client was merely persistently attempting to use an old directory cache. coderman wrote: > On 10/24/06, Fergie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ... >> Oct 24 23:15:19:698 [Notice

Re: Silly question...

2006-10-25 Thread coderman
On 10/24/06, Fergie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... Oct 24 23:15:19:698 [Notice] Tor v0.1.2.2-alpha. This is experimental software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity. ... Oct 24 23:15:20:167 [Notice] We now have enough directory information to build circuits. Oct 24 23:15:25:276 [Notice] No T