That was hilarious. Even though I shouldn't condone activity like
that, I laughed about that message all day.
Thanks
Comrade Ringo Kamens
On 5/29/07, Kyle Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was testing a spam-reply script and or-talk@freehaven.net got into it
somehow.
My bad, sorry.
On 5/
I was testing a spam-reply script and or-talk@freehaven.net got into it
somehow.
My bad, sorry.
On 5/29/07, Kyle Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FIRST AND FINAL WARNING
You have 48 hours to remove me from your mailing list.
If you do NOT remove me, I will DDOS (Distributed Denial of Se
I was testing a spam-reply script and or-talk@freehaven.net got into it
somehow.
My bad, sorry.
FIRST AND FINAL WARNING
You have 48 hours to remove me from your mailing list.
If you do NOT remove me, I will DDOS (Distributed Denial of Service) your
server until you are broke.
Try me, I got 10 OC192's, 15 OC48's, and 8 OC12's just waiting for shit like
this...and I'm getting pissed. If
On Tue, 29 May 2007 09:57:47 -0400
Nick Mathewson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:55:32PM +0800, Li-Hui Zhou wrote:
> > >
> > > Is HAVE_STRUCT_IN6_ADDR is defined in orconfig.h?
> > >
> > > Where is struct in6_addr defined in your system headers?
>
> You didn't answer t
Coming back to the matter of speed: what do we need to increase the
performance of the tor network? More tor (exit) nodes, right? (please
correct me if I'm wrong)
More nodes is not the answer. You could add one million dialup speed
nodes, and not improve the speed of Tor.
More bandwidth is part
Just a quick question. I thought that the encryption system used was
based on factoring a large prime. If so, won't it become obsolete when
quantum computers become available? That is something that I expect to
see in this lifetime.
At which point folks will switch to ECC (like the NSA already d
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 10:44:18AM -0700, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
> Just a quick question. I thought that the encryption system used was
> based on factoring a large prime. If so, won't it become obsolete when
> quantum computers become available? That is something that I expect to
> Will they be able to decrypt the data from a middle node?
Not in this lifetime.
Just a quick question. I thought that the encryption system used was
based on factoring a large prime. If so, won't it become obsolete when
quantum computers become available? That is something that I expect to
se
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:17:39AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > A list of ISPs with which Tor node operators have had experience with
> > can be found at
> > http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/GoodBadISPs
>
> It's not editable or I'd add Cyberonic to the the list of GOOD ISPs
On 5/29/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Windows has offered over 10 Gigabit throughput on a workstation (running
Windows Server 2003) since 2005...
veering off topic here, but the vast majority of 10GigE devices have
hardware TCP offload support, which is how OS stacks can push toward
the
> A list of ISPs with which Tor node operators have had experience with
> can be found at
> http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/GoodBadISPs
It's not editable or I'd add Cyberonic to the the list of GOOD ISPs. They
are now on the COVAD backbone, so you should be able to get service fro
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 08:55:32PM +0800, Li-Hui Zhou wrote:
> >
> > Is HAVE_STRUCT_IN6_ADDR is defined in orconfig.h?
> >
> > Where is struct in6_addr defined in your system headers?
You didn't answer the above questions. I need to know what's going on
there. There seems to be some problem wh
Do ISPs really care about whether people run servers on residential accounts
Depends on who you ask .. but generally, as long as you pay your bill
and you don't make them do paperwork on your behalf (eg: DMCA crapola),
they ignore it.
do they scan ports? If so, how often?
Again .. depends
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 04:23:51AM -0700, coderman wrote:
> On 5/28/07, Steven Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >...
> >I do think that a global passive adversary is stronger than the real
> >world situation. For example, such an adversary could read traffic
> >between two computers in my offic
On Mon, 28 May 2007 23:47:52 -0400
Nick Mathewson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> Try re-running configure on the latest svn?
>
> Is HAVE_STRUCT_IN6_ADDR is defined in orconfig.h?
>
> Where is struct in6_addr defined in your system headers?
>
> yrs,
> --
> Nick Mathewson
Tried re-confi
Windows has offered over 10 Gigabit throughput on a workstation (running
Windows Server 2003) since 2005...
http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/AMD_10_GbE_Performance_Paper_August05.pdf
Regards,
Tony.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on
17 matches
Mail list logo
