On Friday 01 June 2007, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Thanks for sticking with this. I'll give you a quick suggestion that
> you may not find useful quite yet but it'll sure come in handy soon:
> how about putting a version number (or a few numbers) on it? :)
I actually added the subversion revision t
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 12:05:42AM -0500, Pat Double wrote:
> I have released a new Incognito "tiny" Live CD. The major change is that it
[snip]
> http://fwks5nwum4hpjnin.onion/incognitotiny-i686.iso.torrent
> http://www.patdouble.com/incognitotiny-i686.iso.torrent
Hi Pat,
Thanks for sticking wi
I have released a new Incognito "tiny" Live CD. The major change is that it
will now fit on a "business card" CD which holds 50MB. Note that this is Tor,
Privoxy, Firefox and now ChatZilla on a CD you can carry in your wallet.
Other changes:
- Clean up squid conf, bind UDP listener to only loca
Hi,
i have read in the rend-spec.txt:
Bob's OP opens a stream to each directory server's directory port via Tor. (He
may re-use old circuits for this.) Over this stream, Bob's OP makes an HTTP
POST' request, to a URL "/tor/rendezvous/publish" relative to the directory
server's root, containing a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Though I have no idea about the __AllDir... stuff, I can give you a
first hint to solve it:
> [Info] update_networkstatus_client_downloads(): Our most recent
> network-status document (from nobody) is 1180650256 seconds old;
>
> and where is that age
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 03:32:37PM -0700, scar wrote:
> while Tor is still able to build circuits, it doesn't seem to be
>able to download updated lists of routers. then, after several days,
>there is no way for Tor to build circuits. is this related to the
>__AllDirActionsPrivate setting? relate
i am getting this message on the same system which uses the
__AllDirActionsPrivate, that is, WinXP now running the 0.1.2.14 version of Tor.
it shows every minute:
[Info] update_networkstatus_client_downloads(): Our most recent network-status
document (from nobody) is 1180650256 seconds old; do
[Hi, folks. This message also went to or-dev, but I think there are
some tool maintainers who aren't on that list.]
Hi, all!
As you probably know, Tor has had a few different directory protocols
in its lifetime. The oldest one (the "v1 protocol") was pretty bad:
it took up a lot of bandwidth, a
Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There will be the chaos-communication-camp in August in Germany
> > (http://events.ccc.de/camp/2007/intro) with a 10G uplink.
[..]
> One last note -- are they all going to be using IP addresses from the
> same /16 network, or will the IP addresses b
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:15:18AM -0700, Mr. Blue wrote:
> I am using tor 1.1.26
You might want to stop that; 0.1.2.x has a lot of security
improvements.
> So...,
> Whenever my script detects change of MD5 value of
> cached-routers,
> it clears DB and by using regular expesion it fill DB
> with
I am using tor 1.1.26
So...,
Whenever my script detects change of MD5 value of cached-routers,
it clears DB and by using regular expesion it fill DB with nodes.
Now...,
I decided I wana have only exit nodes in DB.
After looking at one already made script I saw that it connects to Tors control
I am using tor 1.1.26
So...,
Whenever my script detects change of MD5 value of
cached-routers,
it clears DB and by using regular expesion it fill DB
with nodes.
Now...,
I decided I wana have only exit nodes in DB and not
all of them.
After looking at one already made script I saw that it
connec
12 matches
Mail list logo
