* on the Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 04:12:21PM -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
As you know, a major security vulnerability was just patched with the
0.1.2.16 release. I have been using the noreply.org deb packages but
they didn't update to the newest version (at least not under amd64
feisty). If you are
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, coderman wrote:
On 8/10/07, Ringo Kamens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what he is saying (which might be true) is that tor doesn't
have the permissions to save the torcc.
there are some configurations that don't allow saving the config.
they are still vulnerable.
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Kyle Williams wrote:
This is not true. The affects of the bug are very sever, and it DOES NOT
require the config to be saved! An attacker could still cause you to loose
your anonymity.
UPDATE, UPDATE, UPDATE.
like i wrote before, you are only vunerable if you have the
@Mike: Good to know. I'll just use the etch version for now since
feisty isn't out.
Comrade Ringo Kamens
On 8/11/07, Florian Reitmeir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007, Kyle Williams wrote:
This is not true. The affects of the bug are very sever, and it DOES NOT
require the
Hi,
Forgive my ignorance, but when exactly does the Control Port come
into play? Is a Tor user who simply uses Tor in client mode
vulnerable? I've seen the Control Port info in the man pages but
that doesn't really answer my question - can anyone advise?
Thanks...
--
Physical Therapy
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 02:21:31PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Forgive my ignorance, but when exactly does the Control Port come
into play? Is a Tor user who simply uses Tor in client mode
vulnerable? I've seen the Control Port info in the man pages but
that doesn't really answer my
On
http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#ServerForFirewalledClients
one of the suggested methods to get your Directory service on port 80 if Apache
is
in the way is to use mod_proxy.
Personally I think sticking tors directory service behind Apache so it's
not exposed to the
Roger, thank you for your response - I did follow that thread when
it came out and upgraded my systems. The question I have is not
really about the vulnerability but more of a general operational
one - in what situations is the control port actually used? If I am
not running a Tor server but
On Sat, 2007-11-08 at 15:33 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger, thank you for your response - I did follow that thread when
it came out and upgraded my systems. The question I have is not
really about the vulnerability but more of a general operational
one - in what situations is the
Freemor, thanks a lot - that makes perfect sense...glad I upgraded
:)
-Nd
On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 18:13:12 -0400 Freemor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-11-08 at 15:33 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger, thank you for your response - I did follow that thread
when
it came out and
Respect and stay safe. You are a hero.
Comrade Ringo Kamens
On 8/11/07, Matthew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just put up a new hidden wiki. It's at http://624eb2rznzhtq2cz.onion/
With a little googling, I found a page that had the main page of the
old hidden wiki, so I put it up as the main
11 matches
Mail list logo
