On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:05:06 +0200 Arjan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Scott Bennett wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:43:30 +0200 Fabian Keil
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[...]
>>> http://bugs.noreply.org/flyspray/index.php?do=3Ddetails&id=3D463
>>>
>> That yielded a page containing
Scott Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:43:30 +0200 Fabian Keil
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>> http://bugs.noreply.org/flyspray/index.php?do=3Ddetails&id=3D463
>>
> That yielded a page containing only the following message:
>
> - Do request is invalid.
>
> However, I too
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:43:30 +0200 Fabian Keil
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Yesterday I got a long string of messages over a ten-minute period
>> that looked like this:
>>=20
>> Sep 25 08:15:09.412 [notice] dns_cancel_pending_resolve(): Bug: Ad
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 09:04:26PM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > Router twins did start in the day of onions to lay circuits, but
> > they lived at least for a while into the onion skin (incremental
> > path) era.
>
> Could you please clarify? What's an onion, how does it differ from
> the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
and here it is: http://sidbox.homelinux.org/~sid77/tor.html
- --
Marco Bonetti
Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://www.slackintosh.org
Linux-live for powerpc: http://www.slackintosh.org/pub/rsync/mb/linux-live
My webstuff: http://sidbox.homeli
> Router twins did start in the day of onions to lay circuits, but
> they lived at least for a while into the onion skin (incremental
> path) era.
Could you please clarify? What's an onion, how does it differ from
the current design?
Juliusz
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 01:50:08AM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 01:27:57AM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> >
> > I've configured this on a private testing tor network and it appears
> > to work without problems, but it is a huge pain to build a fake tor
> > network big
On 9/22/07, Spartacus qqjanji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello to all,
>
> i'm spartacus the owner of spartacus tor server.
> I'm running the tor server mainly for studing this new protocol
>
> I'm quite new in this tecnology, i ask you to understand How-To:
>
> 1) Torify a full PC.
> I have
Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yesterday I got a long string of messages over a ten-minute period
> that looked like this:
>
> Sep 25 08:15:09.412 [notice] dns_cancel_pending_resolve(): Bug: Address
> [scrubbed] is not pending (state 3). Dropping.
>
> I'm running 0.2.0.7-alpha u
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
> A number of server operators have been reporting seeing these lines
> in their logs lately:
>
> Sep 25 04:59:13.165 [warn] Rejecting truncated ESTABLISH_INTRO cell.
> ...
Hmm, it looks like it was us (our university working group), tr
Yesterday I got a long string of messages over a ten-minute period
that looked like this:
Sep 25 08:15:09.412 [notice] dns_cancel_pending_resolve(): Bug: Address
[scrubbed] is not pending (state 3). Dropping.
I'm running 0.2.0.7-alpha under FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE. What does this message
mean?
11 matches
Mail list logo