On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:06:48 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:02:53 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>>
>> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:20:42 -0500 (CDT), "Scott Bennett"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:05:27 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >
>>
Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Then they should learn to do so. English is easy, and already the
> lingua franca.
English is not easy, nor is it a lingua franca. Just read "The Chaos" by
Nolst Trenite to see why. Let's stop this before we all need to learn
Esperanto or Lojban to communicate.
Watson Ladd
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:02:53 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:20:42 -0500 (CDT), "Scott Bennett"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:05:27 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:52:30 -0500 (CDT), "Scott Bennett"
> > ><[EMA
I'm trying to set up a free wireless service for those of my neighbors
within range of a little wireless router I have. To keep things safe for
me and at least somewhat safer for them, I want to route all the outbound
connections from that router through tor using pf under FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE
I searched and didn't find your IP in our logs.
Nice. I personally don't have a Mac, so what program are you using to look
at the PDF? Apple Preview?
I've also noticed that almost every third party application in Linux that
can look at a PDF is also safe from this.
I think this is Adobe specific
Hello all
I have upgraded a little time ago to Tor 0.1.2.17, since i run it i
could notice that i became high latency and packet loss, as you can see
at the ping results i did on google.ch, this can't be a problem of google,
beacuse all my other not torified applications, like online gaming for
ex
FYI, for any Tor controller developers who aren't on or-dev.
--Roger
- Forwarded message from Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Does your Tor controller use "setrouterpurpose"?
Delivery-Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 1
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 09:06:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I can confidently state that arguing about mailing list etiquette
> is a futile pursuit. As someone who lived through "The Day" when AOLers
> were given usenet access in 1994, I understand the breaking of
> etiquette. However,
8 matches
Mail list logo