I also have reproduced this error with 0209alpha on win32 and have
logged everything at info level.
Do you want my log? How big files can you receive? The log is 30MB+ and
I would rather send you the interesting parts rather than the whole log
file. But how big files can you receive by email?
/Vi
Hi,
I have a concern that running a tor may in some cases
provide a security breach allowing unexpected access
to the inside of certain networks that are behind
firewalls. In particular, I am concerned with what I
assume is a fairly common design for home routers.
This scenario may well illustra
BTW, the problem is happening right now, if you want to test something
on my server.
The logging is at info level.
I can resist from restarting Tor, so that you can test the problem "live".
Tell me what to do if you need information.
/Vikingserver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
> I also have reproduce
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:38:18AM CET, Scott Bennett wrote:
> The documentation that comes with tor rather strongly suggests that exit
> servers should have exit policies rejecting the SMTP port (25). The tor
> sample torrc includes this rejection as well. This rejection of exits to
> port
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:41:18PM +0100, Lexi Pimenidis wrote:
Our exit node has already been used to send spam over Port 80, i.e.
using the yahoo web interface (there was a small discussion on that a
No. Spam has been sent via Yahoo. It's their problem, not Tor's.
Block
The error message I get is not the same as the one in the bug report.
And the log doensn't look like in the bug report.
Perhaps it's the same problem in the code causing different error
messages, perhaps not.
The message I get is the following:
Nov 07 18:19:59.296 [notice] I learned some more di
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:41:18PM +0100, Lexi Pimenidis wrote:
> Our exit node has already been used to send spam over Port 80, i.e.
> using the yahoo web interface (there was a small discussion on that a
No. Spam has been sent via Yahoo. It's their problem, not Tor's.
Blocking port 25 is differ
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:37:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I also have reproduced this error with 0209alpha on win32 and have
> logged everything at info level.
I think Nick has a handle on fixing the bug:
http://bugs.noreply.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&id=543
Hopefully it will be
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 08:20:37AM -0800, Martin Fick wrote:
> My home router offers an http administration console
> on port 80 which for obvious security reasons is
> normally only accessible from the internal facing side
> of the router. While many of these home routers
> typically have an inte
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:28:45 +0100 "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another top-poster. Sigh. I'm leaving in the content you deemed
irrelevant as context (i.e., Roger's message) for your message because I'm
interested in getting the problem resolved. It has already cripp
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 05:10:55PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
> >The error message I get is not the same as the one in the bug report.
> >And the log doensn't look like in the bug report.
>
> It doesn't look like mine, either.
No, this is very likely all the same bug.
We added a lot of ext
On Nov 7, 2007 8:52 AM, Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 08:20:37AM -0800, Martin Fick wrote:
> > My home router offers an http administration console
> > on port 80 which for obvious security reasons is
> > normally only accessible from the internal facing sid
12 matches
Mail list logo
