Scott Bennett wrote:
> I still don't understand the thinking of those people. I have no reason
> to believe that the Chinese government is allowing the NSA to control IP
> addresses allocated to, and served inside, China. It makes no sense at all,
> and leads me to conclude that the whole l
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:11:15 + Mike Cardwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Kyle Williams wrote:
>
>> This is just a theory, no hard facts to back it up.
>> When I'm messing around with Tor's ControlPort, I've noticed that my Tor
>> traffic just hangs until whatever I'm doing on the ControlP
I'd be interested in participating.
Comrade Ringo Kamens
On Dec 20, 2007 11:34 PM, Andrew Del Vecchio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Speaking of the devil, I've actually thought about this an came up with
> an entire system about a year or so ago,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Speaking of the devil, I've actually thought about this an came up with
an entire system about a year or so ago, but I couldn't find anyone who
seemed to find interest in it, so it's been in hibernation since then.
Send me an e-mail and I'll dig it up
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:44:09 -0800 "Kyle Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Dec 19, 2007 12:46 AM, Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> A little while ago, I added another filter rule to the router here to
>> stop an apparently endless, rapid-fire series of directory request
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:17:08 -0800 "F. Fox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I know on HyperWRT/Thibor, it has QoS functions for port ranges and
>Ethernet ports.
>
>I recently moved "kitsune" to an older machine (still enough for the
>small amount of bandwidth I'm relaying anyway - and at least it'
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:46:56 -0500 Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 02:46:04AM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> A little while ago, I added another filter rule to the router here to
>> stop an apparently endless, rapid-fire series of directory requests h
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 09:11:02 -0500 Michael Holstein
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The symptom, like the last time, was that output rate on my
>> machine's main Ethernet interface was running steadily around the transmit
>> rate limit imposed by my ADSL line.
>tweak as desired ... this would pe
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 21:44:09 you wrote:
>
>
> BTW, the SOA for your DIG request, ns.bta.net.cn (202.96.0.133), had a
> direct match on http://cryptome.org/nsa-ip-update13.htm
> Just thought you should know...
Anyone know what 'NSA-Affiliated' actually means?
I can't find a cryptome defi
I assume a correlation between these two events, although I wonder how
(blocked) window shrinks could lead to this. My idea was to
automatically search in syslog for window shrink events and then block
the guilty IPs for 24 hours with iptables. But I hope that anybody
understands what was the
On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 01:44:09PM -0800, Kyle Williams wrote:
> This is just a theory, no hard facts to back it up.
> When I'm messing around with Tor's ControlPort, I've noticed that my Tor
> traffic just hangs until whatever I'm doing on the ControlPort stops. There
> have been a couple of time
Hello,
On 19.12.2007, at 09:46, Scott Bennett wrote:
Is anyone else having this kind of trouble, regardless of the apparent
origin(s) of the attack(s)?
This night I some TCP attacks (?) reported by syslog. About one half
on TOR's Dir Port, the rest on port , approximately also opened by
T
Am Donnerstag, 20. Dezember 2007 15:08 schrieb kazaam:
> Here's an answer from 1blu why they are closing the tor-servers:
>
> >Gern nutzen wir die Gelegenheit zur Stellungnahme.
> >Als Dienstanbieter haftet die 1blu AG spätestens ab Kenntnis auch für
fremde
> >Inhalte.
Isnt this is a bullshit?
Here's an answer from 1blu why they are closing the tor-servers:
>Gern nutzen wir die Gelegenheit zur Stellungnahme.
>Als Dienstanbieter haftet die 1blu AG spätestens ab Kenntnis auch für fremde
>Inhalte. Damit ist sie schon zur Vermeidung einer eigenen Haftung berechtigt
>und verpflichtet, Kunde
Kyle Williams wrote:
This is just a theory, no hard facts to back it up.
When I'm messing around with Tor's ControlPort, I've noticed that my Tor
traffic just hangs until whatever I'm doing on the ControlPort stops.
There have been a couple of times where I do something very wrong on the
con
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> A) This explains why it is trying the old introduction points, and it
> explains why it's building a long circuit trying each one in turn. But
> why is it trying the same introduction point more than once?
Uhhhm, right. The problem is that introduct
16 matches
Mail list logo