Hi,
I'm trying to switch from privoxy to polipo. But polipo seems to have an
annoying problem. Polipo gets started as a service while booting, the same as I
did with privoxy. But tor gets just started with activating Vidalia.
The problem is if tor is not running when polipo gets started it
From the contolPort + API, I am able to grab descriptors of or's using,
GETINFO desc/name/[someNickName],
I am then able to parse these descriptors out of the response, and send
these descriptors to other onion routers (ones, that are not fetching
descriptors from the dirservers). At these
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It's all just politics though. They have no problem with promoting
censorship here in the US! Are they hypocrites? Yes. Is this something
we all didn't already know? Of course not...
~Andrew
- --
People just like you lose untold millions in personal
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that's wrong: TOR also countermeasures traffic
analysis and other sorts of information
abuse.
That's why i'm using TOR also for IRC and ICQ.
To countermeasure taking a public IP number e. g.
from an email header into a log file
via an editor (e. g. for
--- tor user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imagine what someone was doing with your new IP
address the few hours before you had control of it,
or
the few hours after you release it, when such errors
can happen.
Oops, sent the email too soon. I wanted to add:
I would feel really nervous about
How many simultaneous connections from a tor client to a directory
mirror's DirPort are legitimate? Is more than a single such connection
necessary, and if so, why?
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 11:09:57AM -0600, Jon McLachlan wrote:
+POSTDESCRIPTOR purpose=general cache=no+CRLF+desc+CRLF+.+CRLF
However, when I post the descriptor with the latter (purpose=general),
Tor trips an assert on line 3115 in routerlist.c. It seems to be
indicating an error that
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 08:18:28PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
How many simultaneous connections from a tor client to a directory
mirror's DirPort are legitimate? Is more than a single such connection
necessary, and if so, why?
Here are three cases where it occurs legitimately:
a)
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 01:34:48 -0500 Roger Dingledine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 08:18:28PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
How many simultaneous connections from a tor client to a directory
mirror's DirPort are legitimate? Is more than a single such connection
9 matches
Mail list logo
