Pages 48 && 49 are encouraging/reassuring ... oufff [relief].
In a sense, I--maybe--start to understand those peaks in Kuala Lumpur
and Singapore from the statistics map [in Singapore one can't even chew
chewing-gums in the subway, but who knows ... better smaller/minor devils than
bigger ones].
That is fairly true, within a margin of error. Symmetric encryption has one
bit of output for every bit of input (with padding), so the size will be
reasonably close. If you know all of the pages on a specific host (and they
are either static or don't change much dynamically), you could guess at th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm working on a presentation where I teach people how to install Tor. I
have always heard it is best practice to use NoScript and TorButton, but
TorButton automatically hooks "dangerous javascript". Is there any
reason to have noscript installed after
Was reading Rodger's slides and anybody have a link with more info on slide 41
... "If you can see an SSL-encrypted link, you can guess what web page is
inside based on length"
First I am hearing of this one and genuinely curious.
-Peter
Poetic typo:
What if China 0wns a CA?
where "0wns" is
nadazero whiskey november sierra
at page 30 ... or--kewl!--it has been humor? :)
For your information: Ch1n4 and Ch1n3s3 LOVE football!
(While the only BBC worth reading--unless one is doing researches
on semiology and newspeak, or
** researchers use it to study anonymity
** Funding from US DoD
Cool, how kind!, I am guessing that the, e.g., DoD doesn't get tax deduction ...
Who is the "French NGO"? ... hope not Reporter Sans Frontieres
Bah, nice wording anyway
8-)
/Roy Lanek
--
S berak
In cooperation with Idefix :) I placed them online. You can find them
here:
http://dewinter.com/2008/08/18/defcon-16-slides-deanonymizing-tor-are-up/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> Nathan Evans -De-TOR-iorate Anonymity
>
> http://rapidshare.com/files/138077751/defcon-1
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 04:58:48AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> What is a
> typical high water mark for the number of onionskins actually in a decryption
> queue at one time? Under what circumstances?
Usually relays are well under the 100 mark. The only cases I've seen in
practice where it happ
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nathan Evans -De-TOR-iorate Anonymity
http://rapidshare.com/files/138077751/defcon-16-evans-grothoff.pdf.html
Sorry, got no other webspace. Maybe someone could upload it somewhere else.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 04:55:22PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anyone have access to the following presenations (ppt, pdf,
> other)given at DEFCON 16 last week?
>
> Roger Dingledine -Security and anonymity vulnerabilities in Tor:
> past, present, and future
http://freehaven.net/~arma/s
Does anyone have access to the following presenations (ppt, pdf,
other)given at DEFCON 16 last week?
Roger Dingledine -Security and anonymity vulnerabilities in Tor:
past, present, and future
Nathan Evans -De-TOR-iorate Anonymity
Thanks for the info..
--
Explore all of Europe's beauty! Click n
Hey list,
because the end of this years Google Summer of Code is standing in
front of us, I decided to write a little mail to this list saying what
exactly I have done during the last 3 months and how you could use it.
Let me first give you a brief introduction to client authorization for
I can't get access to the webmail through Opera (Mac)...
It works with other browsers but I wish to use it on Opera.
After I put my adress and pw, I get a white page...
Anything I sould do to solve that ?
Le 17-août-08 à 19:48, Noiano a écrit :
anonym wrote:
For free you'll get 128 MB storage an
Thank you guys for that info, I think I'll go for it.
Le 17-août-08 à 19:48, Noiano a écrit :
anonym wrote:
For free you'll get 128 MB storage and no advertisements (neither
in the
interface nor injected in mails). If you don't care about ad
injection
(beware that it breaks detached PGP sign
anonym wrote:
> For free you'll get 128 MB storage and no advertisements (neither in the
> interface nor injected in mails). If you don't care about ad injection
> (beware that it breaks detached PGP signatures) you could go for a free
> account with 1024 MB of storage. They also have pay subscript
Dawney Smith schrieb:
> Those are ports used for mail submission, not for mail relay. They wont
> be abused by spammers. ISPs often block their consumer broadband users
> from connecting to port 25 on servers outside of their network, to
> prevent spam. They don't block 465 and 587, because they're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17/08/08 12:46, Charles.F wrote:
> So what good free e-mail webmail account would you recommend for most
> practical use and best anonymity ?o
I recommend (and use) lavabit's services (see: https://lavabit.com).
They have a webmail interface that
Theoretical question #2: augmenting Tor's bandwidth ...
VIDEO: American Girl on Fox News: "I was running from Georgian troops, I
want to thank the Russian troops"
Global Research, August 17, 2008
FOx News
American Girl on Fox News: "I was running from Georgian troops, I want
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 12:46:35PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.7K bytes in
24 lines about:
: So what good free e-mail webmail account would you recommend for most
: practical use and best anonymity ?
Not sure about best for anonymity, but many people seem to like
http://www.fastmail.fm be
I can't unsubscribe from this group - help!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Roger Dingledine
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2008 2:03 AM
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: The "de-Tor-iorate Anonymity" talk by Nathan Evans at DEFCON 16
On F
So what good free e-mail webmail account would you recommend for most
practical use and best anonymity ?
Le 16-août-08 à 22:03, Ringo Kamens a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
krishna e bera wrote:
Yahoo and Gmail both have degraded versions of webmail available
for whe
I didn't know about it.
I just had a look and it seems too complicated to install.
It already took me days to understand what tor is (I am not in
computer) and I can't do more.
I guess webmail with tor is safe enough, isn't it ?
Le 17-août-08 à 11:47, Lexi Pimenidis a écrit :
On 16/08/2008, C
At Wayne Madsen's [of whom I am not a fan, not to mention the Washington Post]
site, waynemadsenreport.com, you can read
U.S. May Ease Police Spy Rules
More Federal Intelligence Changes Planned
By Spencer S. Hsu and Carrie Johnson
Washington Post Staff Writers
Saturda
On 16/08/2008, Charles.F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If one wants to be anonymous when sending an receiving mails, one
> should use privoxy and tor on his browser and also disable Java,
> Javascript, cookies and so on.
Just curious: why don't you use Mixmaster for e-mail privacy?
Best Regards,
Hi,
one question related to the port 465/587 thread.
Could it be useful to open at least the ports for mixmaster remailers,
capable of submission via TLS, SSL connections or SMTP (2525)?
reject private:*
# drooper.mixmin.net (banana)
accept 88.198.22.131:587
accept 88.198.22.131:2525
accept 88.1
25 matches
Mail list logo
