Over the last several days, a server nicknamed "mnl" has been posting
descriptor updates bearing highly suspect data rate information. I have
contacted the person at the contact-info address, so he is aware that the
observed data rate (misnamed "bandwidth") reported in mnl's server descriptor
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 05:15:15AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> bandwidth 5242880 10485760 52239166
> ---> ~48.8 MB/s (!)
Wow. Nice! :)
And, as you say, unlikely to be true.
> All of the above leads me to suspect two things. One is that there may
> be s
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 06:42:02 -0400 Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 05:15:15AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> bandwidth 5242880 10485760 52239166
>> ---> ~48.8 MB/s (!)
>
>Wow. Nice! :)
>
>And, as you say, unlikely to be t
Scott Bennett wrote:
>
> Nearly 49 MB/s seems a bit of a stretch. The server's operator sent me
> a note saying that the server is attached to the 1 GB/s campus backbone net,
> but it is attached via a 100 Mb/s router, so the reported data rate is four
> to five times the rate physically pos
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:10 AM, Olaf Selke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scott Bennett wrote:
>>
>> Nearly 49 MB/s seems a bit of a stretch. The server's operator sent me
>> a note saying that the server is attached to the 1 GB/s campus backbone net,
>> but it is attached via a 100 Mb/s router
F. Fox([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 06:27:08PM -0700:
> Bill Weiss wrote:
> (snip)
> > My Tor node runs a medium-load mail server as well, and I've never been
> > blacklisted for spam stuff [1]. That seems like a decent indication of it
> > not causing problems given how rabid the anti-
Kasimir Gabert wrote:
>
> Would you mind looking over the new
> router detail page and seeing if it looks reasonable to you? You can
> view it at
> http://trunk.torstatus.kgprog.com/router_detail.php?FP=795513a52e5155af5e36937d5a7c76d3bf20d0c4
Sir, Yes Sir!
It appears to be slighly below my mr
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 05:15:15AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
>
> [...]
>> That brings us back to something I've already posted on OR-TALK, namely,
>> the apparent slowdown in tor traffic that has reduced the traffic through my
>> tor server by at least 30% and, j
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Lucky Green <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Also interesting to me is the overall reduced amount of traffic over the
> last few months that I have been seeing with my middleman nodes. The
> most likely explanation is that the overall Tor network capacity is exit
Wouldn't the throughput of your server depend on the nodes up and
downstream of it?
On Sep 9, 2008, at 8:02 PM, Lucky Green wrote:
Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 05:15:15AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
[...]
That brings us back to something I've already posted on OR-
TA
10 matches
Mail list logo
