Hello Everyone,
I've been working on a project for a couple of months now that I'm sure
would be of interest to some of you. The goal was to apply the same
transparent model coderman and I used with JanusVM and Tor VM into
hardware. I wanted something small that you could connect, power on, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Kyle Williams wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I've been working on a project for a couple of months now that I'm sure
would be of interest to some of you. The goal was to apply the same
transparent model coderman and I used with JanusVM and Tor VM
I was wondering if this is the same issue as discussed in this message:
Exceeding connection limit
http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Dec-2008/msg00015.html
Windows imposes a default limit of 10 concurrent TCP connect attempts. Is that
the same as a system-imposed limit on the number of open file
Industry organization putting pressure on Tor exit node operators to filter
leads to chilling effects.
As nodes start to filter, that traffic will seek out non-filtering exits. That
would work like a funnel, as a majority of traffic of that sort will exit
through a decreasing number of exits,
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 01:00:38PM -0800, Curious Kid wrote:
Industry organization putting pressure on Tor exit node operators to filter
leads to chilling effects.
As nodes start to filter, that traffic will seek out non-filtering exits.
That would work like a funnel, as a majority of
Thanks for your quick response. I apologize for taking so long to get
back to this matter. I was sidetracked at a most inopportune moment and then
had to deal with an amazing deluge of email in order to get back down near
my disk quota limit. :-}
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:57:49 -0800
On Sun, 21 Dec 2008 05:22:41 +0100 Mitar mmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
I am running FreeBSD ~6.3 (i386), but I see the thread counts stated
earlier when running it as a relay. In client-only mode, I think there's
only one
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:31 PM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
...
is it possible you have an old openssl cacerts package without the
newer ev signing and root ca's?
Beats me.
yup, that appears to be it. (looking at the certs you got).
nothing nefarious, aside from another
8 matches
Mail list logo
