> If somebody submitted a clean short patch for this, we'd probably
> put it in.
For simplicity, I'd definitely go with making the '*' match any and
all levels to the left of its placement, inclusive. *.google.com
would match a.google.com, b.a.google.com, z.<...>.google.com. Noted
because combinin
Zinco wrote:
Matej Kovacic wrote:
Hi,
this seems an interesting issue:
http://www.making-the-web.com/misc/sites-you-visit/nojs/
bye, Matej
Anon Mus Wrote:
Been to this site and it dont work on my firefox.3.0.8 browser... (with
NoScript, QuickJava, Better Privacy, Java
Alexander Cherepanov wrote:
Hello, Anon!
You wrote to or-talk@freehaven.net on Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:44:12 +0100:
Of course, websites & organizations have the right to choose which ports
they use for which services and open/close. Anyone trying to inflict
that kind of system on any "internet"
Hello, Scott!
You wrote to "Alexander Cherepanov" , or-talk@freehaven.net
on Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:43:49 -0500 (CDT):
>>> Having a set of standard port numbers at which
>>> one may expect to access standard services is valuable,
>>
>>Sure it is valuable but AFAIU tor is not there to bring order bac
Hello, Anon!
You wrote to or-talk@freehaven.net on Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:44:12 +0100:
> Of course, websites & organizations have the right to choose which ports
> they use for which services and open/close. Anyone trying to inflict
> that kind of system on any "internet" user community should STOP
Scott Bennett wrote:
Unfortunately, the above method is unlikely to see more than a tiny
fraction of the port 43 exits, which are usually of very short duration.
Instead, try turning on info-level logging. Then you can use something
like
/usr/bin/fgrep connection_edge_finished_connect
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 02:43:49AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> >The main discord here seems to arise from totally different approaches
> >to the question. You are building a whitelist while default tor exit
> >policy is a blacklist. IMHO it's hard to constructively discuss amending
> >blacklis
Well it's kind of odd to list the features I've added by what I've taken out
but here goes...
First of all, Torfox is produced independently from the Tor anonymity
software or Firefox web browser and carries no guarantee from The Tor
Project or Mozilla Foundation about quality, suitability or anyt
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:42:16 +0400 "Alexander Cherepanov"
wrote:
>You wrote to or-t...@seul.org, scr...@nonvocalscream.com on Sun, 14 Jun 2009
>01:15:43 -0500 (CDT):
>
>> Now, another person on this list has argued that the RFC's should be
>> ignored and that IANA should be ignored. I
9 matches
Mail list logo
