On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:04:59 -0400 Michael
wrote:
>Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 08:16:00AM -0400, Michael wrote:
>>
>>>What I *am* doing is deploying a couple of heavy iron closed relays
>>> on OC3 or better bandwidth. The first is now deployed after a lot of up
Phil wrote:
>
> I realize this needs a fix not a workaround, but if a workaround is enough
> for now you could try running lynx via proxychains --> tor
>
> Proxychains might grab all the DNS requests.
Thanks for your response. Now that I know lynx doesn't leak DNS when
the protocol (e.g. http:
It would be interesting to see more stats about the effect of other
major media stories about Tor, Slashdot effect, etc. This whole Iran
thing is a great way for a number of adversaries to slip in undetected.
Ringo
Phil wrote:
> --- On Wed, 6/24/09,
>
>> 150% jump, in such a short time. Not
>> s
Hi everyone,
I want to announce to the list that tor-ramdisk 20090627 is out.
Tor-ramdisk is an i686 uClibc-based micro Linux distribution whose only
purpose is to host a Tor server in an environment that maximizes
security (hardnened binaries and kernel) and privacy (no logging at any
level
On 06/25/2009 05:03 PM, Phil wrote:
> No discussion or comments on this? What does it mean?
It means everyone is busy working on other things. I encourage you to
do the analysis yourself.
--
Andrew Lewman
The Tor Project
pgp 0x31B0974B
Website: https://torproject.org/
Blog: https://blog.torp
All,
The answer to this may be "yeah, duh.", just thought I'd ask :). I've
got a residential cable connection where I am guaranteed 22mbit down,
5mbit up. My Tor relay BandwithRate is 1000 KB bursting up to 2000 KB.
While Tor is running, incoming and outgoing pings to the nearest hop
go
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 08:47:01AM -0700, Kris Linquist wrote:
> The answer to this may be "yeah, duh.", just thought I'd ask :). I've
> got a residential cable connection where I am guaranteed 22mbit down,
> 5mbit up. My Tor relay BandwithRate is 1000 KB bursting up to 2000 KB.
>
> While T
On 2009-06-27 17:58, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> While Tor is running, incoming and outgoing pings to the nearest hop
>> goes from ~15ms to ~300+ms. This is very obvious when browsing.
>
> 1000KB is 8 megabit. 2000KB is 16 megabit.
>
> Tor counts in units of '1' rather than units of '1/8' :)
>
D'oh. Thank you :)
Roger Dingledine wrote:
1000KB is 8 megabit. 2000KB is 16 megabit.
Tor counts in units of '1' rather than units of '1/8' :)
Whereas your cable provider counts in units that produce large
impressive-sounding numbers.
See also
https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRou
Bandwidth tests (dslreports/speedtest.net) show that I am getting at
least the guaranteed rate - usually significantly more. DOCSIS 3.0 cable.
Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
Also:
Does your line really give you 22 mbit/s?
How fast did that (ADSL?) modem really sync?
What protocols are on the lin
On 2009-06-27 18:07, Kris Linquist wrote:
> Bandwidth tests (dslreports/speedtest.net) show that I am getting at
> least the guaranteed rate - usually significantly more. DOCSIS 3.0 cable.
The you should shape your uplink to slightly below the netto speed you
measured to avoid queues in the modem
On 2009-06-27 17:47, Kris Linquist wrote:
> Is this expected or do you think it's poor performance by either my ISP
> or cable modem at accepting many connections?
Traffic shaping.
http://lartc.org/wondershaper/
Hi,
I just started a session of TBB (current release) and when the homepage opened
up it told me I was not connected to the Tor network. So I went to TorCheck
and it told me the same thing. Then I used NewNym (via 'New Identity' in
Vidalia) and with the new Exit node IP both TorCheck and the
"Please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe someone made HS
security/usability improvements a while ago which included the
username:passphrase option and making it possible to keep the URL hidden
from anyone except those who are provided the URL?"
As far as I know, no such feature has been imp
14 matches
Mail list logo
