you can try running on port 80 in the VM (and --redir tcp:80::80),
setup apache mod_rewrite, or get wordpress to quit sucking.
(there might be a more effective method, but i don't like wordpress,
so have no idea what it might be.)
For some reason qemu doesn't want to redir port 80 to the guest's
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 3:26 AM, Ringo2600den...@gmail.com wrote:
...
For some reason qemu doesn't want to redir port 80 to the guest's port
80. I'm sure nothing else is listening on my host's 80. Any other ideas
or possible solutions to this?
unfortunately you must run qemu as root to bind
James Brown (25.07.2009 00:16):
Gitano wrote:
James Brown wrote:
And what about phone calls, including call to ordinaty telephones?
I use 'ihu' as an alternate for skype, but its a peer-to-peer
application and for Linux only. AFAIK there is no SIP-based VoIP
Software using Tor.
unfortunately you must run qemu as root to bind to privileged ports
like 80, which negates some of the protections you're hoping to
provide.
Is there a system list that can be edited and have port 80 removed from it?
Ringo
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:12:52 +0700 Vlad \SATtva\ Miller
sat...@pgpru.com wrote:
James Brown (25.07.2009 00:16):
Gitano wrote:
James Brown wrote:
And what about phone calls, including call to ordinaty telephones?
I use 'ihu' as an alternate for skype, but its a peer-to-peer
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:58:42 -0400 Ringo 2600den...@gmail.com
wrote, quoting without attribution:
unfortunately you must run qemu as root to bind to privileged ports
like 80, which negates some of the protections you're hoping to
provide.
Is there a system list that can be edited and have
Hi everyone,
I'd like to set up an situation where users on a LAN can optionally reroute
just their DNS queries through tor. What I have is a gateway router where
bind9 runs on udp 53 (caching only) and tor uses DNSPort 5300. I'd like the
users to be able to do something on their local
Ringo wrote:
unfortunately you must run qemu as root to bind to privileged ports
like 80, which negates some of the protections you're hoping to
provide.
Is there a system list that can be edited and have port 80 removed from it?
Maybe POSIX Capabilities are an option:
Hello, Scott!
You wrote to or-talk@freehaven.net, Vlad \SATtva\ Miller sat...@pgpru.com
on Sat, 25 Jul 2009 06:59:43 -0500 (CDT):
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 18:12:52 +0700 Vlad \SATtva\ Miller
sat...@pgpru.com wrote:
James Brown (25.07.2009 00:16):
[skip]
Very many Russian people were killed,
Hi,
is DirPortFrontPage only available to Directory Mirror operators?
If so, what is the additional overhead of mirroring the Directory?
And finally, what is the option syntax?
Thanks,
GD
_
Windows Live™ Hotmail®: Celebrate the
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 7:55 PM, downie -downgeo...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi,
is DirPortFrontPage only available to Directory Mirror operators?
difficult to have a DirPort open otherwise :)
If so, what is the additional overhead of mirroring the Directory?
someone else can speak to the
11 matches
Mail list logo
