Stable releases - old versions

2009-07-30 Thread grarpamp
Related to the blox* thread. When 0.2.0.3x was marked stable, I went through and mailed all the contacts running old versions. Some profusly thanked, some silently updated, some ignored. It would be handy if... Upon marking and releasing a new stable branch, include in the release notes what the

Re: Newcomer - Want only act as server between servers

2009-07-30 Thread Scott Bennett
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:53:11 +0200 "Bernd Schmelter" wrote: >Scott Bennett schrieb: >> Hi Bernd, > >[...] > >> It must be because it does appear to be working. :-) However, you >> didn't provide enough information for us to look for your relay in the >> consensus or directory informatio

Re: Newcomer - Want only act as server between servers

2009-07-30 Thread Bernd Schmelter
Scott Bennett schrieb: > Hi Bernd, [...] > It must be because it does appear to be working. :-) However, you > didn't provide enough information for us to look for your relay in the > consensus or directory information to see how that looks. I tried > searching on your email address in cas

Re: Two different hidden service on the same tor client

2009-07-30 Thread Gitano
Roger Dingledine wrote: > Hidden services aren't exactly robust these days though, so the fact > that you couldn't reach the second service is not a huge surprise. > > "Upgrade to 0.2.1.19 and try again" is the best advice I can offer. Well done! Thank you for that version. After several days o

Re: Thanks for the inclusion...

2009-07-30 Thread Andrew Lewman
On 07/30/2009 06:14 AM, Michael Cozzi wrote: > >Hello Tor Team. > I'm not sure who to thank, but I noticed my suggested text > regarding what "IT Professionals use Tor for" was included whole cloth > on the web page. Thanks for the content. I did strip out one bullet point, "* The CTO i

[RESOLVED] Re: seven bloxortsipt* relays ought *not* to be Valid

2009-07-30 Thread Scott Bennett
A few hours back, I wrote: > In the directory, I found seven relays whose names all begin with >"bloxortsipt": > > bloxortsipt3 > bloxortsipt11 > bloxortsipt30 > bloxortsipt38 > bloxortsipt58 > bloxortsipt71 > bloxortsipt81 > >These relays > >

Re: (FWD) Re: seven bloxortsipt* relays ought *not* to be Valid

2009-07-30 Thread Scott Bennett
On Thu, 30 Jul 2009 03:02:00 -0400 Roger Dingledine wrote: >[Forwarding since truxton appears not to be subscribed to or-talk. As >for the questions: a) yes, you should upgrade, that version is way old, >and b) check out >https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#MultipleRelay

Re: Thanks for the inclusion...

2009-07-30 Thread Jim McClanahan
Michael Cozzi wrote: > > Hello Tor Team. > > I'm not sure who to thank, but I noticed my suggested text regarding > what "IT Professionals use Tor for" was included whole cloth on the web > page. > > Thank you, that gave me geek-warm-fuzzies. > > Michael Very nicely done. It h

Thanks for the inclusion...

2009-07-30 Thread Michael Cozzi
Hello Tor Team. I'm not sure who to thank, but I noticed my suggested text regarding what "IT Professionals use Tor for" was included whole cloth on the web page. Thank you, that gave me geek-warm-fuzzies. Michael

Re: seven bloxortsipt* relays ought *not* to be Valid

2009-07-30 Thread Jim McClanahan
Scott Bennett wrote: > a) are running an obsolete version of tor (0.1.2.19) under LINUX, >which is far enough back to be a security problem due to the SSL >key generation bug in LINUX, If the key generation problem refers to what I think, and just for the record, th

(FWD) Re: seven bloxortsipt* relays ought *not* to be Valid

2009-07-30 Thread Roger Dingledine
[Forwarding since truxton appears not to be subscribed to or-talk. As for the questions: a) yes, you should upgrade, that version is way old, and b) check out https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#MultipleRelays Thanks! -RD] - Forwarded message from owner-or-t...@freehaven.