>
> Neither. If you have a selective way of telling
> people you deem "in the need", than you meet my
> criteria. It would likely be hard for us all to
> meet that criteria though, I don't. You may tell
> me that you can help me, but then I have to trust
> you, which doesn't really make too much
--- On Mon, 10/19/09, Flamsmark wrote:
>
> I think that unless you have a good way of telling specific
> people in the need of a bridge about your bridge without
> telling the world, that you should not consider being a
> bridge,
>
> Is that a gut feeling, or based on some
> research? What about
2009/10/19 Martin Fick
> I think that unless you have a good way of telling specific people in the
> need of a bridge about your bridge without telling the world, that you
> should not consider being a bridge,
>
Is that a gut feeling, or based on some research? What about the ways that
we have o
I think that unless you have a good way of telling specific people in the need
of a bridge about your bridge without telling the world, that you should not
consider being a bridge,
-Martin
--- On Mon, 10/19/09, Flamsmark wrote:
> From: Flamsmark
> Subject: Re: any rough stats on bridges ?
>
>
> I'd like to see some stats, or even some conjecture, as to the longevity of
> a bridge, and what it means for the bridge to be born, be used, and
> eventually be blocked.
>
> I understand the mechanisms used to slowly feed bridge information to
> people who request them, but even that slowness
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Karsten Loesing wrote:
On 10/19/2009 04:10 PM, John Case wrote:
It would be interesting if someone in the know could let us know how
many bridges are running ... I'd further be interested in the total
number that have been submitted over time, vs. the number that are
actua
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/19/2009 04:10 PM, John Case wrote:
> It would be interesting if someone in the know could let us know how
> many bridges are running ... I'd further be interested in the total
> number that have been submitted over time, vs. the number that are
>
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:05:28 -0400 Nick Mathewson
wrote:
>On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:40:44AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> After running './configure CFLAGS="-march=prescott"', a 'make' in the
>> top (tor-0.2.2.5-alpha) directory did the following.
>
>I can't reproduce this; can you say
It would be interesting if someone in the know could let us know how many
bridges are running ... I'd further be interested in the total number that
have been submitted over time, vs. the number that are actually running
now ... maybe some rough ideas as to their average bandwidth, etc.
My u
9 matches
Mail list logo
