> In the meantime, I guess we're at a standoff.
> "What the fuck, freebsd? Why did you break a system library?"
Until FreeBSD updates their base, include a note in the source
release build docs in big block letters: BUILDING TOR ON FREEBSD...
That caveat and instructions would hopefully registe
> (when I no more could use tor)
You need to update openssl. Check the list archives for this month
about how to successfully do that using either canonical sources or
freebsd ports.
> Right. Unfortunately, it seems that FreeBSD patched openssl in such a way
> that it is entirely impossible for
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:08:30PM +0100, Lexi Pimenidis wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 08:56:37PM CET, Sam Peterson wrote:
>
> Hej,
>
> > Clearly the experts think it makes things considerably easier here, so
> > maybe there's something I'm missing. I appreciate all tutelage.
>
> Just one tr
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 09:41:56PM +0100, Sebastian Hahn wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Luis Maceira wrote:
> > The well-known TLS renegotiating error which the tor-0.2.1.21
> > version was supposed to address persists on FreeBSD-8.0 updated as
> > of today.The unstable version (0.2.2.6)
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010 21:41:56 +0100 Sebastian Hahn
wrote:
>On Jan 8, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Luis Maceira wrote:
>
>> The well-known TLS renegotiating error which the tor-0.2.1.21 =20
>> version was supposed to address persists on FreeBSD-8.0 updated as =20
>> of today.The unstable version (0.2.2.6)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 8, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Luis Maceira wrote:
The well-known TLS renegotiating error which the tor-0.2.1.21
version was supposed to address persists on FreeBSD-8.0 updated as
of today.The unstable version (0.2.2.6) same thing the error
persi
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 08:56:37PM CET, Sam Peterson wrote:
Hej,
> Clearly the experts think it makes things considerably easier here, so
> maybe there's something I'm missing. I appreciate all tutelage.
Just one trivial example is: given that you only have two hop circuits
and an attacker who
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 2:01 PM, moris blues wrote:
> hi,
>
> When Aubau a connection is checked whether the path already exists. The CirID
> is
> compared, but with whom the CircID is compared, there is a table of who and
> how
> is it stored?
> Where is the table? On the Directory servers?
I'm
Having read the heated discussion regarding some people's suggestion
on the list to provide an option to reduce the number of hops in a
circuit, I'm curious about something and was wondering if someone
smarter than I could enlighten me.
Clearly smarter minds agree that 3 hops are necessary. Howev
On 01/08/2010 09:43 AM, Olaf Selke wrote:
> is there still any ongoing development to let tor take better advantage
> from a multi-cpu system than only performing onionskin decryption?
Yes, this is on the very-short-term todo list for January. There are
some tricky threading issues to resolve, b
The well-known TLS renegotiating error which the tor-0.2.1.21 version was
supposed to address persists on FreeBSD-8.0 updated as of today.The unstable
version (0.2.2.6) same thing the error persists (On Linux and using tor-0.2.2.6
the error does not exist -I had this error only on Debian Testing
On Friday 08 January 2010 11:46:23 Thomas Amm wrote:
> Am 01.01.2010 03:38, schrieb emigrant:
> > On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 07:41 -0600, Programmer In Training wrote:
> >> You can use mine at
> >> http://blog.joseph-a-nagy-jr.us/2009/12/getting-serious-about-security/
> >> The image is licensed same as
hi,
is there still any ongoing development to let tor take better advantage
from a multi-cpu system than only performing onionskin decryption? With
NumCPUs set to 8 my node looks like this:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ P COMMAND
8823 debian-t 20 0 607m 343m 2
Am 01.01.2010 03:38, schrieb emigrant:
> On Thu, 2009-12-31 at 07:41 -0600, Programmer In Training wrote:
>
>> You can use mine at
>> http://blog.joseph-a-nagy-jr.us/2009/12/getting-serious-about-security/
>> The image is licensed same as the post (e.g. CCD CopyWrite
>>
> Hi,
> thanks for t
14 matches
Mail list logo
