olaf.se...@blutmagie.de schrieb:
> [...]"Staatsanwaltschaft" (don't know the correct English term) [...]
Its called "prosecutor".
-idefix
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talk
Ted Smith wrote :
> It breaks the Tor IM Bundle, for starters. And it seems like the only
> supported free client is irssi, which is a definite lose for usability.
I've read the last RC2 version of KVirc (http://kvirc.net)is supporting
SASL, but I didn't test it myself.
*
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 01:15 -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> http://blog.freenode.net/2010/01/connecting-to-freenode-using-tor-sasl/
>
> It looks like the freenode irc channel is trying a new approach for
> handling its Tor users. (This is great, since for a long time it looked
> like they were pl
http://blog.freenode.net/2010/01/connecting-to-freenode-using-tor-sasl/
It looks like the freenode irc channel is trying a new approach for
handling its Tor users. (This is great, since for a long time it looked
like they were planning to just let Tor users slowly starve to death.)
Has anybody pl
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 02:13:30PM +, Soviet Union wrote:
> > https://bugs.torproject.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&id=1252
> >
> > Hopefully our debian maintainer will get it sorted out in the next
> > few days.
>
> Did the new subversion tor-geoipdb_0.2.1.23-2~~lenny+1_all.deb be maked
--- On Wed, 2/17/10, downie - wrote:
> > One of the reasons is to prevent malicious users from
> including file:// urls in an external webpage. With file://
> urls, a webpage could be designed to test for the existence
> of local files on your computer.
>
> How? Same origin policy prevents an
grarpamp schrieb:
>> Thanks for your stats Olaf, intresting and sad to see that there sue peoples
>> for no good reason. In your case it's really a abus to become 7 inquieres in
>> less 2 months :/
>
> Yeah, they're just doing due diligence though.
yep, I've nothing to complain about. Police is
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:18:03 -0800
> From: mogul...@yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: Access from a local file
> To: or-talk@freehaven.net
> One of the reasons is to prevent malicious users from including file:// urls
> in an external webpage. With file:// urls, a webpage could be designed to
> tes
> Thanks for your stats Olaf, intresting and sad to see that there sue peoples
> for no good reason. In your case it's really a abus to become 7 inquieres in
> less 2 months :/
Yeah, they're just doing due diligence though.
This is actually good news. Because after at least seven inquiries, the
--- On Wed, 2/17/10, Jon Cosby wrote:
>
> I'm referring to links from file:// urls. By default,
> Torbutton blocks this, and has it "recommended."
Ah, you mean the file protocol. Firefox itself tends to have this disabled by
default also. One of the reasons is to prevent malicious users from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
17/02/10 19:22, Jon Cosby:
>
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:01:08 -0800 (PST), Martin Fick
> wrote:
>>> What's the risk in accessing the
>>> Internet from a local file? Is this actually traceable to my
>>> computer?
>>
>> You will have to clarify a bit bet
> To: or-talk@freehaven.net
> Subject: Re: Access from a local file
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:22:00 -0600
> From: j...@jcosby.com
>
>
> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:01:08 -0800 (PST), Martin Fick
> wrote:
> >> What's the risk in accessing the
> >> Internet from a local file? Is this actually trace
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:01:08 -0800 (PST), Martin Fick
wrote:
>> What's the risk in accessing the
>> Internet from a local file? Is this actually traceable to my
>> computer?
>
> You will have to clarify a bit better what you mean. On
> its own this question does not make much sense. A file
>
--- On Wed, 2/17/10, Jon Cosby wrote:
> What's the risk in accessing the
> Internet from a local file? Is this actually traceable to my
> computer?
You will have to clarify a bit better what you mean. On
its own this question does not make much sense. A file
does not access things, programs d
It's been said that 10kb is plenty for a bridge in numerous Tor videos.
However, if I were to try to run a bridge, which is not indicated, and I would
in theory try this configuration:
User tor
PidFile /var/tmp/tor-bridge.pid
Log notice file /var/log/tor/tor-bridge.log
RunA
What's the risk in accessing the Internet from a local file? Is this
actually traceable to my computer?
Jon
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 07:38:18AM -0500, and...@torproject.org wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:22:42PM +0100, b...@chefe.dyndns.org wrote 3.6K
>> bytes in 65 lines about:
>> : [warn] TLS error: unexpected close while renegotiating
>>
>> This means your openssl disab
Hello Everyone,
Firstly thank all of you so much for your concern. I really appreciate all
effort which for anonymity by open source.
Mike, I'm reading and trying to understand your changes on path and
dir-spec. Could you say please why there isn't "Wge" integer value on list?
Can't we select a n
Hi Paul,
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:27:56 -0500 Paul Syverson
wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 12:30:22AM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:16:28 -0500 Flamsmark
>> wrote:
>> >On 14 February 2010 03:15, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> >But one big problem is that y
19 matches
Mail list logo
